December 14th, 2004, 10:49 PM
|
|
Contributing User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Miami and NY
Posts: 133
Time spent in forums: 9 h 4 sec
Reputation Power: 4
|
|
Quote: | Originally Posted by gchaney Hey Click4! Good to hear about G. Hopefully you'll start seeing some of that stuff payoff for you in the serps very soon G. Crossing my fingers it starts working for me soon...lol
With Y and M both I found it boiled down to page specifics and b/l. I did comparative weight analysis on top 3 sites and balanced my pages out to match there caps as a percentage. I kick but on the i/b/l anchor text and this seemed to do the trick. Links are pretty important with M more so than Y. I definitely have seen this improvement as M started gobbling up my links.
What really kicked it up a notch with both however, was anchor text in deep links pointing to specific optimized pages. Really helped capture moving traffic of 4 and 5 word phrases. Be surprised at how many searchers are typing "Florida Widgets for Blue wrenches" (yes...all made up but get the point..lol)
Seems like searchers are getting pretty keen to be specific in what they are looking for. These deep anchors tied to on page SEO really have effectively tripled traffic since I started 2 months ago with deep linking, even with decent rankings on Primary for Y & M.
Hope this helps get you moving in Y & M! |
what do you mean by deep linking, can you give us an example, is that just getting inbound links to pages other than just the main url? and can you explain your comparitive weight analysis? ive got a #1, #4 and #60 serp on Mbeta for my main 3 keyword phrases (3 and 2 words each) but only #20 on Y for the same kw that i have a #4 on Mbeta and #463 on Y for the #4 Mbeta, is that just because of on-page optimization is more heavily weighted? thanks for the input.
|
SEO Chat Forums Sponsor:
Del.icio.us
Digg
Google
Spurl
Blink
Furl
Simpy
Y! MyWeb
Linear Mode
