Google Optimization
 
Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
 
 
User Name:
Password:
Remember me
Go Back   SEO Chat ForumsGoogleGoogle Optimization

Reply
Add This Thread To:
  Del.icio.us   Digg   Google   Spurl   Blink   Furl   Simpy   Y! MyWeb 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
 
Unread SEO Chat Forums Sponsor:
  #1  
Old November 21st, 2004, 09:20 AM
newsguy newsguy is offline
Registered User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 14 newsguy User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: < 1 sec
Reputation Power: 0
Google founders to offload 14 million shares

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200411/s1248082.htm

More shares being issued. More $ for Google!

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old November 21st, 2004, 09:51 AM
GeoffreyF67's Avatar
GeoffreyF67 GeoffreyF67 is offline
Resident Black Hat
SEO Chat Beginner (1000 - 1499 posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 1,436 GeoffreyF67 User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)GeoffreyF67 User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)GeoffreyF67 User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)GeoffreyF67 User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 5 Days 22 h 29 m 16 sec
Reputation Power: 9
Oh please! Everytime a company founder decides to profit on their shares and hard work they've put into a company for several years, people start saying they're "worried" or "duping people" or that they are "greedy".

Yes, 14 million sounds like a lot but how many shares do they own?

Ahh right. They own about 90 million shares collectively and will still have about 40% voting power vs 44%.

Source: http://www.marketwatch.com/news/yhoo/story.asp?source=blq/yhoo&siteid=yhoo&dist=yhoo&guid=%7B63DABD36%2DA3B3%2D4BD9%2D820C%2D8311CDEF8C B9%7D

Sounds like a great deal to me. Would YOU pass it up? That's about 2.352 billion dollars there over the space of about 18 months.

G-Man

Last edited by pk_synths : November 22nd, 2004 at 10:37 AM.

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old November 21st, 2004, 11:46 AM
walkman walkman is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Novice (500 - 999 posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 555 walkman User rank is Private First Class (20 - 50 Reputation Level)walkman User rank is Private First Class (20 - 50 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 5 Days 16 h 4 m 49 sec
Reputation Power: 5
I agree with you. They'd be stupid if they didn't cash some in.



Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffreyF67
Oh please! Everytime a company founder decides to profit on their shares and hard work they've put into a company for several years, people start saying they're "worried" or "duping people" or that they are "greedy".

Yes, 14 million sounds like a lot but how many shares do they own?

Ahh right. They own about 90 million shares collectively and will still have about 40% voting power vs 44%.

Source: http://www.marketwatch.com/news/yhoo/story.asp?source=blq/yhoo&siteid=yhoo&dist=yhoo&guid=%7B63DABD36%2DA3B3%2D4BD9%2D820C%2D8311CDEF8C B9%7D

Sounds like a great deal to me. Would YOU pass it up? That's about 2.352 billion dollars there over the space of about 18 months.

G-Man

Last edited by pk_synths : November 22nd, 2004 at 10:37 AM.

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old November 21st, 2004, 10:31 PM
brandall brandall is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Regular (2000 - 2499 posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,274 brandall User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)brandall User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)brandall User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)brandall User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)brandall User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 3 Weeks 2 Days 7 h 15 m 44 sec
Reputation Power: 23
Strategic selling of stock by company founders after a company goes public tells you nothing about the future stock value. Only a complete idiot would hold onto all of their stock in that situation. Having a huge majority of your net worth in any single investment is not smart. They will be able to sell about 2x as many shares in the Spring, and you can bet they will. Thereafter, you can bet they will set up some automatic sell routines that sell x number of shares evey quarter regardless of the price. That is just how you deal with large aounts of insider stock.

I remember when Google was about to go public and many people here thought the expected $115 per share projected IPO price was rediculously high, and that those dumb enough to invest were going to lose their shirts. Oooops, I guess that unfounded negativity was a little out of touch with reality. I think the belief that Google's founders selling off some stock as their regulated holding periods come to an end signals an eminant drop in the stock's value is just as unfounded. Google's stock is currently priced quite fairly based on their projected P/E and that of their competitors. The stock will go up if they continue to improve earnings faster than projected. If earnings grow slower thatn projected, the price will go down. And either way, the founders will sell their stock, bit by bit and build more diversified portfolios.
__________________

"Live never to be ashamed of what is written about you. Even if what is written is not true" -- Richard Bach

Yahoo Store Design

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old November 21st, 2004, 10:53 PM
Kadence Kadence is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 48 Kadence User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 27 m 14 sec
Reputation Power: 5
Certainly this selling of shares is not a negative signal, and the market will not take it as such. It is pretty common for people who own large amounts of public companies undertake diversification programs like this.

One thing that might affect Google is that they are issuing more shares ([http://online.wsj.com/media/info-google-chart.gif); an increased supply of shares might reduce the stock price. Theoretically, it shouldn't--because the market should have already accounted for that--but it might not work out like that. In any case, Google's stock price is tabbed as being very volatile--the implied volatility on Google options is enormous.

Last edited by pk_synths : November 22nd, 2004 at 10:37 AM.

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old November 22nd, 2004, 01:30 AM
unknown unknown is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Like
Posts: 46 unknown User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 h 33 m 10 sec
Reputation Power: 5
they should invest in oil or power cells... (if you are smart, you would invest in power cells) as if the whole world isn't going to survive on power cells in the next 50 years...
__________________
unknown

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old November 22nd, 2004, 12:15 PM
Kadence Kadence is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 48 Kadence User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 27 m 14 sec
Reputation Power: 5
Quote:
Last edited by pk_synths : Today at 10:37 AM.
Eh? What was my post edited for? The only change I see is that the wsj.com link isn't clickable now. Not sure why that would be edited--it wasn't advertising, as I certainly don't own the Wall Street Journal

Anyway, hard assets would make sense for Google. Mark Cuban got lucky because he sold the Yahoo shares he got when he sold out to them almost at the market peak, and placed his money into the Dallas Mavericks, a much more stable asset.

This new "Keyhole" thing appears to be Google's first attempt to put a blatant product ad on their homepage. Though I'm guessing their conversion rate will be miniscule A lot of people are going to click that and then be like "I have to pay money? Screw this!"

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old November 22nd, 2004, 08:39 PM
n_a_nutshell n_a_nutshell is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 88 n_a_nutshell User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 2 h 39 m 30 sec
Reputation Power: 5
MSN already dominates the I.E. homepages
of America. By now it's subconscious for the average
internet user. MSN = homepage. That's what Google
has to worry about. Their results will always be the best,
but that's irrelevant at this point.

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old November 23rd, 2004, 12:19 PM
LiGhTen's Avatar
LiGhTen LiGhTen is offline
Permanently Banned
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 361 LiGhTen User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Day 3 h 22 m 51 sec
Warnings Level: 10
Number of bans: 1
Reputation Power: 0
I should remove my investment

Reply With Quote
Reply

Viewing: SEO Chat ForumsGoogleGoogle Optimization > Google founders to offload 14 million shares


Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes  Rate This Thread 
Rate This Thread:


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
View Your Warnings | New Posts | Latest News | Latest Threads | Shoutbox
Forum Jump


Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
  
 





© 2003-2008 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 6 hosted by Hostway
Stay green...Green IT