Suggestions & Feedback
 
Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
 
 
User Name:
Password:
Remember me
Go Back   SEO Chat Forums > Forum Information > Suggestions & Feedback
Reload this Page

Ethically wrong

Discuss Ethically wrong in the Suggestions & Feedback forum on SEO Chat.
Ethically wrong Use this forum for either suggesting ideas or submitting feedback about our forums. Suggestions, constructive criticism, and other feedback appreciated.

Reply
Add This Thread To:
  Del.icio.us   Digg   Google   Spurl   Blink   Furl   Simpy   Y! MyWeb 
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »  
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
 
Unread SEO Chat Forums Sponsor:
  #1  
Old April 10th, 2008, 05:55 AM
Prof.stan Prof.stan is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Intermediate (1500 - 1999 posts)
  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,647 Prof.stan User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)Prof.stan User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)Prof.stan User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)Prof.stan User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)Prof.stan User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 3 Weeks 3 Days 15 h 13 m 53 sec
Warnings Level: 5
Number of bans: 1
Reputation Power: 12
Ethically wrong
Guys I would like to share my views with you.
If someone post any specific queries as for example about on page optimization
Points are
Title
Header
Content
Inter linking

After that other person add
Title
Header
Content
Inter linking
And website canonical issue

I think this is post spamming because other person’s only extra point is website canonical issue remain things have mentioned in first post.
He/ She should like other factor is website canonical issue some thing like that
What do you people think????????
Last edited by Prof.stan : April 10th, 2008 at 08:29 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old April 10th, 2008, 06:25 AM
full house's Avatar
full house full house is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Novice (500 - 999 posts)
  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Philippines
Posts: 758 full house User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)full house User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)full house User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)full house User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 3 Days 12 h 24 m 5 sec
Warnings Level: 1
Number of bans: 1
Reputation Power: 4
Send a message via Yahoo to full house Send a message via Google Talk to full house
I think its not.

I think thats the usual format of posting, so can't be a spam.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old April 10th, 2008, 07:39 AM
pro_seo's Avatar
pro_seo pro_seo is offline
Moderator
SEO Chat Frequenter (2500 - 2999 posts)
  
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: I N D I A
Posts: 2,908 pro_seo User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)pro_seo User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)pro_seo User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)pro_seo User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)pro_seo User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)pro_seo User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Month 3 Weeks 6 Days 16 h 55 m 40 sec
Reputation Power: 40
Send a message via MSN to pro_seo Send a message via Yahoo to pro_seo Send a message via Google Talk to pro_seo Send a message via Skype to pro_seo
Thanks for your suggestion stan.

It depends, if both the posts convey the same message, then the 2nd post can be considered as unnecessary addition to the thread.

But if the second post somehow clarifies or rectifies the first post, then that would be an useful addition
__________________

SEO FAQs - You might find your answer here.
SEOchat Forum Rules - Read Before You Post

**Do what you feel in your heart to be right- for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't.**
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old April 10th, 2008, 08:33 AM
Prof.stan Prof.stan is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Intermediate (1500 - 1999 posts)
  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,647 Prof.stan User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)Prof.stan User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)Prof.stan User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)Prof.stan User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)Prof.stan User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 3 Weeks 3 Days 15 h 13 m 53 sec
Warnings Level: 5
Number of bans: 1
Reputation Power: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by pro_seo
But if the second post somehow clarifies or rectifies the first post, then that would be an useful addition

Thanks you got what I am saying but in 2nd post he has to add only canonical issue I am not saying it is post spamming but as I feel it is unethical approach.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old April 10th, 2008, 09:00 PM
gazzahk's Avatar
gazzahk gazzahk is offline
Roll the dice.. and live
SEO Chat Expert (3500 - 3999 posts)
  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,546 gazzahk User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)gazzahk User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)gazzahk User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)gazzahk User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)gazzahk User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)gazzahk User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)gazzahk User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 2 Months 1 Week 2 Days 23 h 2 m 40 sec
Reputation Power: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prof.stan
Thanks you got what I am saying but in 2nd post he has to add only canonical issue I am not saying it is post spamming but as I feel it is unethical approach.
Why? If a poster is trying to be helpful even if the answer is of limited help how is that "unethical"
Quote:
unethical - not conforming to approved standards of social or professional behavior;
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/unethical

Quote:
An action or conduct which violates the principles of one or more ethical systems, or which is counter to an accepted ethical value, such as honesty.
www.ethicsscoreboard.com/rb_definitions.html

How is this in conflict with the above definitions of unethical?
__________________
Live the moment
Reply With Quote
Reply

Viewing: SEO Chat Forums > Forum Information > Suggestions & Feedback > Ethically wrong

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes  Rate This Thread 
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Rate This Thread:


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
View Your Warnings | New Posts | Latest News | Latest Threads | Shoutbox
Forum Jump


Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
  
 





© 2003-2008 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 1 hosted by Hostway. 
Stay green...Green IT