
May 2nd, 2008, 02:58 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2
Time spent in forums: 16 m 10 sec
Reputation Power: 0
|
|
|
Testing SEO with a controlled experiment
Folks with a background in science should be familiar with experimental design. If you want to test something, a basic experiment divides subjects into 2 groups: a control and experimental group. The groups should be identical except that the experimental group has been subjected to some outside factor. Differences that arise between the two groups can be attributed to the outside factor.
I have applied a very rough experimental design to my SEO efforts on a new site and have been very surprised by the findings.
I launched 2 brand new sites at about the same time in 2/08:
1. Atlantaprice.com: This is “control” site with similar content to the page I was optimizing for:
2. localprice.com/atlanta/homesecurity.html. I have been optimizing for the search terms: “Atlanta home security”
For the past 2 months, I have engaged in a full fledged SEO effort and have built 500 inlinks according to Webmaster Tools and 100 of which are directed to this specific page. Not all are a high quality, but there are many with PR in the 2-5 range. I published 6 articles, did a press release, listed the site in most major directories, optimized the site content, purchased some links, etc. Essentially, I did everything that all the SEO sites and my SEO consultant recommended.
Admittedly, the techniques worked well for Yahoo results. But, after all this, my control site is well ahead of my experimental site in Google rankings. The site with no inlinks and no SEO effort ranks at about 100 and the site that got all the SEO attention is at about 200 on Google. Can someone explain this?
|