|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |
||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Term Vector Theory
Hiya,
I was just wondering if anyone knows about the Term Vector Theory as detailed by Miislita.com: http://www.miislita.com/term-vector/term-vector-1.html The gist of it seems to be that you can have 1000 pages and 3 of them contain keyword rich content.. but if you were to include that keyword once across the remaining 997 pages, then you're reducing the weight of that keyword and thus decreasing your chances of ranking well for that term. Does anyone know any more about this theory, or solidly follow it? Thanks Steph |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Looks like complete rubbish to me...
__________________
Live the moment |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Write great content and you will not need to worry much about all of these theories.
Write great content and SEO is a five minute job.
__________________
* Its not the size of the dog in the fight that matters... it's the size of the fight in the dog. * Free advice generally isn't worth much, but cheap advice is worth even less. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
While I don’t have time to go thro’ the post you’ve mentioned, Term vector theory, better known as vector space model is one of the fundamental information retrieval ( IR ) model. For your academic interest I’m attaching a research paper filed by Google ranking algorithm fellow, Amit Singhal about modern day Information Retrieval It’s better to leave all theories to the algo developer teams unless you are trying to get job there;)
__________________
"Every job is a self-portrait of the person who did it. Autograph your work with Excellence." “Underpromise and Overdeliver !” |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
No, that's not rubbish at all, have you really read it. The conclusion of the article is that focusing on keyword density is a loss of time. But the first poster misunderstood part of the article and his concusion is irrelevant The article says: Quote:
That's the filtration process used by any search engine, in which it will remove useless words (like stop words) or words that appear so often within the corpus of documents that they do not add any semantic meaning. If you read the whole article and ....understand it, it is impossible to conclude that: Quote:
Last edited by Keiros : July 24th, 2008 at 07:40 AM. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks for the summary Keiros. The article sounds like required reading for anyone overly obsessed with keyword density.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi,
Thanks for everyone's replies. It seems I did misunderstand it but it is quite tricky for me to get my head around. I will re-read it and maybe it will sink in better! I was just interested to know if anyone followed this or strongly believed in its value. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is it easy to include a search program
do they use any special kind of ways for search engines ? |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Term Vector Theory
maybe it has some truth about it,
maybe it is some kind of a way to stop program to create article |
![]() |
| Viewing: SEO Chat Forums > Search Engine Strategies > Search Technologies > Term Vector Theory |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
|
|