Search Engines - Alternative
 
Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
 
 
User Name:
Password:
Remember me
Go Back   SEO Chat ForumsSearch EnginesSearch Engines - Alternative

Reply
Add This Thread To:
  Del.icio.us   Digg   Google   Spurl   Blink   Furl   Simpy   Y! MyWeb 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
 
Unread SEO Chat Forums Sponsor:
Stay one step ahead of the competition. Evaluate and give feedback on some of the hottest web development tools on the market today. Make your opinion heard! Click Here
  #1  
Old February 26th, 2007, 02:53 AM
kk bhakuni's Avatar
kk bhakuni kk bhakuni is offline
BAD SEO!
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In My Dearest Heart
Posts: 424 kk bhakuni User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)kk bhakuni User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)kk bhakuni User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)kk bhakuni User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Week 1 Day 10 h 50 m 26 sec
Reputation Power: 4
Send a message via Yahoo to kk bhakuni
Wikipedia is about to launch Search engine

Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia.org said that they are about to launch a search engines whose algorithm will be published publicaly. INTERESTING ONE!

SOME QUOTES
Wales also said that the Wiki Search engine, part of Wikia, a commercial venture that he floated in 2004, is due for launch before the end of this year. The search engine would use algorithms that would be published for view by all.

Isn't that dangerous, given search engine automisers and spammers who could tweak it to their benefit?

Sure, says Wales, "But security through obscurity is a bad idea." If you have published algorithms, then everyone, including scientists can see it. Then those illuminated minds could contribute to the improvement of the product, is the inference. "But if it is kept secret, then the bad guys, who have all the time in the world and are dedicated to gaining access to your algorithm, will somehow find a way."

for more http://sify.com/finance/fullstory.php?id=14396926
__________________
|| SEO & PPC Company UK || Beach Wedding Dresses

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old February 26th, 2007, 06:49 AM
Visio's Avatar
Visio Visio is offline
Ron Paul 2008
SEO Chat Frequenter (2500 - 2999 posts)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 2,894 Visio User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)Visio User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)Visio User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)Visio User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)Visio User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)Visio User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Month 1 Week 3 Days 1 h 3 m 37 sec
Reputation Power: 31
Send a message via MSN to Visio Send a message via Google Talk to Visio
From what I heard I thought it was going to be human edited just like the wikipedia so the only way to manipulate would be to become an editor. That is the way i took it.Maybe I misunderstood though.
__________________
-Afilliate Seo 101 - The secret to Affiliate success
-SeoChat SEO FAQ - Read the FAQ. It may answer your question.
-Ultimate Guide to Link Building - What you always wanted to know!

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old February 26th, 2007, 05:38 PM
Indigo's Avatar
Indigo Indigo is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: England UK
Posts: 139 Indigo User rank is Lance Corporal (50 - 100 Reputation Level)Indigo User rank is Lance Corporal (50 - 100 Reputation Level)Indigo User rank is Lance Corporal (50 - 100 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 3 Days 19 h 23 m 57 sec
Reputation Power: 2
Now what was that I was stupidly suggesting the other day about Google releasing it's algo every couple of years...?!

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old April 8th, 2007, 08:08 AM
wisam74us's Avatar
wisam74us wisam74us is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 196 wisam74us User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)wisam74us User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)wisam74us User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)wisam74us User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 2 Days 52 m 28 sec
Reputation Power: 3
I think what has enticed them to do it is that major search engines rank them on the first page for highest search volume keywords

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old April 8th, 2007, 10:28 AM
subzero27's Avatar
subzero27 subzero27 is offline
What The Feck..
SEO Chat Novice (500 - 999 posts)
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: I N D Y E A H
Posts: 818 subzero27 User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)subzero27 User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)subzero27 User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)subzero27 User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)subzero27 User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Week 6 Days 7 h 38 m 49 sec
Reputation Power: 14
Send a message via Yahoo to subzero27 Send a message via Google Talk to subzero27 Send a message via Skype to subzero27
se's rank them for highest searched kw'ds but i guess google will discount their weightage as google doesn't like competition.

big G eats its competitors.
__________________
Skype ID - Seovantage
chlorinators
Free Reminder Service|

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old April 8th, 2007, 10:48 AM
wisam74us's Avatar
wisam74us wisam74us is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 196 wisam74us User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)wisam74us User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)wisam74us User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)wisam74us User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 2 Days 52 m 28 sec
Reputation Power: 3
I hope so, Wikipedia always in my way to get higher ranking for many keywords

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old June 19th, 2007, 07:10 AM
webmaster1 webmaster1 is offline
Registered User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1 webmaster1 User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 21 m 33 sec
Reputation Power: 0
my 1st post

this will be great lets watch how google deal with his competitor

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old June 19th, 2007, 11:36 AM
reever2 reever2 is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 63 reever2 User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Day 5 h 55 m 31 sec
Reputation Power: 2
Wiki

Hi,

I haven't seen any evidence of this yet? Does anyone know when this is going to happen? I'm sure Google aren;'t too worried about it- they are far too powerful!

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old June 20th, 2007, 05:22 AM
Poiesis01 Poiesis01 is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cape Town, ZA
Posts: 49 Poiesis01 User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 2 h 4 m 3 sec
Reputation Power: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by kk bhakuni
Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia.org said that they are about to launch a search engines whose algorithm will be published publicaly. INTERESTING ONE!

SOME QUOTES
Wales also said that the Wiki Search engine, part of Wikia, a commercial venture that he floated in 2004, is due for launch before the end of this year. The search engine would use algorithms that would be published for view by all.

Isn't that dangerous, given search engine automisers and spammers who could tweak it to their benefit?

Sure, says Wales, "But security through obscurity is a bad idea." If you have published algorithms, then everyone, including scientists can see it. Then those illuminated minds could contribute to the improvement of the product, is the inference. "But if it is kept secret, then the bad guys, who have all the time in the world and are dedicated to gaining access to your algorithm, will somehow find a way."

for more http://sify.com/finance/fullstory.php?id=14396926
Ja, it will be a real webmasters battle for SERPs but won't get much support from the public if they only find spam sites and MFAs on the first 100 pages instead of what they're looking for.

I'm sure any wiki is aware of this. They may reveal bits of the algo but probably won't make everything public.

But that's just my thoughts, and I have been wrong before

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old June 20th, 2007, 05:39 AM
pro_seo's Avatar
pro_seo pro_seo is offline
Moderator
SEO Chat Frequenter (2500 - 2999 posts)
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: I N D I A
Posts: 2,607 pro_seo User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)pro_seo User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)pro_seo User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)pro_seo User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)pro_seo User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)pro_seo User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Month 2 Weeks 23 h 51 m 59 sec
Reputation Power: 30
Send a message via AIM to pro_seo Send a message via MSN to pro_seo Send a message via Yahoo to pro_seo Send a message via Google Talk to pro_seo Send a message via Skype to pro_seo
I have some links from Wiki.

Guess I would have a top spot
__________________

Social Mobile Messaging
SEO FAQs - You might find your answer here.
SEOchat Forum Rules - Read Before You Post


**Do what you feel in your heart to be right- for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't.**

Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old June 20th, 2007, 05:51 AM
ezhilraja's Avatar
ezhilraja ezhilraja is offline
Chennai
SEO Chat Regular (2000 - 2499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: South India
Posts: 2,041 ezhilraja User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)ezhilraja User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)ezhilraja User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)ezhilraja User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)ezhilraja User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)  Folding Points: 33613 Folding Title: Starter FolderFolding Points: 33613 Folding Title: Starter Folder
Time spent in forums: 1 Month 2 Weeks 4 Days 5 h 28 m 23 sec
Reputation Power: 12
Send a message via MSN to ezhilraja Send a message via Yahoo to ezhilraja Send a message via Google Talk to ezhilraja Send a message via Skype to ezhilraja
Quote:
Originally Posted by pro_seo
I have some links from Wiki.

Guess I would have a top spot
no; links from wikipedia might not help you...

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old June 20th, 2007, 05:54 AM
ezhilraja's Avatar
ezhilraja ezhilraja is offline
Chennai
SEO Chat Regular (2000 - 2499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: South India
Posts: 2,041 ezhilraja User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)ezhilraja User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)ezhilraja User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)ezhilraja User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)ezhilraja User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)  Folding Points: 33613 Folding Title: Starter FolderFolding Points: 33613 Folding Title: Starter Folder
Time spent in forums: 1 Month 2 Weeks 4 Days 5 h 28 m 23 sec
Reputation Power: 12
Send a message via MSN to ezhilraja Send a message via Yahoo to ezhilraja Send a message via Google Talk to ezhilraja Send a message via Skype to ezhilraja
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poiesis01
I'm sure any wiki is aware of this. They may reveal bits of the algo but probably won't make everything public.

But that's just my thoughts, and I have been wrong before
No; the entire algo will be made public; and you can understand why a particular site is #1; and I hope the SERP's of wikia to be as good as google results with less spam. You can read more about wikia search here... http://search.wikia.com/wiki/Search_Wikia

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old June 20th, 2007, 07:57 AM
pro_seo's Avatar
pro_seo pro_seo is offline
Moderator
SEO Chat Frequenter (2500 - 2999 posts)
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: I N D I A
Posts: 2,607 pro_seo User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)pro_seo User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)pro_seo User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)pro_seo User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)pro_seo User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)pro_seo User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Month 2 Weeks 23 h 51 m 59 sec
Reputation Power: 30
Send a message via AIM to pro_seo Send a message via MSN to pro_seo Send a message via Yahoo to pro_seo Send a message via Google Talk to pro_seo Send a message via Skype to pro_seo
Quote:
Originally Posted by ezhilraja
no; links from wikipedia might not help you...


yeah...I know they are nofollowed..but who knows it might

j/k btw ;)

Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old June 20th, 2007, 08:02 AM
jraymond's Avatar
jraymond jraymond is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 137 jraymond User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)jraymond User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)jraymond User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)jraymond User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Day 15 h 5 m 48 sec
Reputation Power: 2
Send a message via Skype to jraymond
This is a horrible idea. I understand the principles behind it, but it will not work. Although scientists might be able to make up better versions of the algorithm, as soon as they are published, every SEM will be looking through there and catering their website to rank at the top for their keywords. This will make the search results inaccurate and only give us the websites of the people with the best SEM's.

Reply With Quote