#1
  1. SEO Consultant
    SEO Chat Genius (4000 - 4499 posts)

    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN, USA
    Posts
    4,206
    Rep Power
    966

    Is it still duplicate content if you are the author?


    I have been wondering recently what the effect of duplicate content would be if you are the author of the content.

    Lets say for example, you contribute an article to a popular website and you have your rel=author in place on the article. But then lets say you also want to include that article on your own site, or a version of it. You also include the rel=author in that page.

    Should you

    1) use a canonical tag to the original
    2) noindex the duplicated article
    3) Use robots to prevent the page from being crawled
    4) Not risk using the article (even though its your own and has rel=author in) on another site

    I would be very interested to hear your thoughts.
  2. #2
  3. Busting SEOChat Spammers!
    SEO Chat High Scholar (3500 - 3999 posts)

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    UK - Kent - Maidstone - PC!
    Posts
    3,754
    Rep Power
    1474
    Its still duplicate content regardless to whether you use rel=author

    If you want to publish content on your site and another site you would be much better of publishing it on your own site first (making sure google has found it) and then publishing it on the other site, but most sites will likely have a problem with this as less and less sites are happy to publish duplicate content these days.

    On the other hand, if you have already published the article on another site and then decide you would like it featured on your site as well, I wouldn't see it being a problem if you use a canonical tag to the original so google knows you have only put the article on your site for your users rather then because you want to pinch content.

    Having said that though, its not something I would likely do, but that's simply because anything of value I would publish on my own site first rather then later down the line

    Comments on this post

    • tstolber agrees : Thanks for your input
    • SEOhostingcouk agrees
    New To SEOChat? See Here & the FAQ's

    "stupid people say stupid things, and smart people out smart each other!" SOAD
    301 Redirects | SEO Tools | Default htaccess | CuteRank
  4. #3
  5. Traffic drop sleuth. :)
    SEO Chat Skiller (1500 - 1999 posts)

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    1,977
    Rep Power
    1516
    I agree with Nathaniel. If you wanted to publish the article on the authoritative site as well as your own then either option #1 or #2 would work. At this point, I don't think the rel=author tag is going to save you from Google seeing it as duplicate content.

    Comments on this post

    • SEO_AM agrees : A book? Read below... Dr. Marie is publishing and authoritative study on links recovery. I want a signed copy!!!
    THE COMPLETE GUIDE TO UNNATURAL LINKS RECOVERY by Dr. Marie Haynes.
    Click here to sign up for my Google Penalty Newsletter.
    Traffic Drop Audits. and Unnatural links penalty recovery help.
  6. #4
  7. No Profile Picture
    Contributing User
    SEO Chat Explorer (0 - 99 posts)

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    68
    Rep Power
    37
    Unfortunately duplication is duplication. Im not convinced that noindex saves you either. Google has never got to grips with why duplication is sometimes required and sometimes downright necessary. Why shouldnt your article be on 6 sites in 6 different sectors ? why shouldnt a 30 franchisee operation each have their own identical websites ? How many pages need to exist on the web before there are natural duplicates of articles - at one point that must happen.

    How many estate agents use the same website template and put their identical property on as many other websites as possible, how many contact us pages are the same ? the answer is loads and loads. Really theres nothing wrong with this, who wouldnt want to market their product in as many places as possible. In real life ( lol ) you can put your advert in the Times the Telegraph and the Sun, same ad no duplication penalty though.

    IMO googles uber view on duplication is totally wrong, even the penalties are not justly applied - I've seen an original site penalised and a new competitor with copied content survive - disgraceful, and google cant tell who had the content first. However, I totally understand no-one wants their content stolen, and there should be safe guards.

    I think if google wants to keep penalising duplication it should put a serious tool out that really marks ownership of content and when, and also an ability to allow or justify the use of duplication. As it says it can detect duplication, make this tool available to us so we can see where our content has been elsewhere published ! ( in the same way they do ).

    The only time ive come across duplication being ok, is if you want to translate your articles / content into a another language - HOWEVER, said translation must not be software generated, it MUST be written by a native speaker in a natural way.
  8. #5
  9. No Profile Picture
    Registered User
    SEO Chat Explorer (0 - 99 posts)

    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    22
    Rep Power
    0
    Google looks at duplication as duplication regardless whether it is produced by the same author. It asks for unique material in your content in order for your content to be approved. Unique content gives authority to a website. Readers demand for something new and interesting. Reading the same matter over and over again does not interest anyone. therefore it is mandatory to keep your content fresh and unique. If your websites are related and require related content. Then you may spin your articles and add fresh material here and there. Otherwise it is regarded as spam.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: Mar 10th, 2011, 04:08 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: Jun 30th, 2010, 11:57 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: Aug 3rd, 2009, 05:38 AM
  4. Duplicate content, but wanted duplicate content?
    By newseoman in forum Google Optimization
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: Apr 1st, 2009, 07:28 AM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: Oct 19th, 2005, 02:14 AM

IMN logo majestic logo threadwatch logo seochat tools logo