|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
 |
|||||||||
| |
||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |
||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
 |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
SEO Chat Forums Sponsor:
|
|
|
|
#1
January 27th, 2005, 10:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Should I post full URL's in links or just relative one's??
I notice that companies like tigerdirect.com post their whole URL in their links on their website:
Example: <a href="http://www.tigerdirect.com/images/123.jpg"> as opposed to: <a href="/images/123.jpg"> Is one better for SEO and if so why or why not??? Thanks in advance, Bebandit 
__________________
If I had a dime for everytime i spent 10 cents...I'd have all my money back!
|
|
#2
January 27th, 2005, 10:13 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
It really, really doesn't matter at all. At least not for Google, and since you posted this in the Google Opt. subforum, I guess that's your main concern.
Just pick one... I prefer relative links, but on some occasions (for example if you tend to move parts of your site, but leave the pictures in place) absolute links might come in very handy. It doesn't matter to googlebot... It translates every link to an absolute link, and it knows how to tell internal from external links without looking solely at the content of the HREF attribute...
__________________
...please help me w/ the real Redscowl Bluesingsky...how2 check backlinks...now postin' @ SEO Refugee ...
·<°`)~ LOL now that I finally have a paypal account, I'm charging 19,- for SEO advice via PM. Seriously...
|
|
| Viewing: SEO Chat Forums > Search Engine Strategies > Search Engine Optimization > Should I post full URL's in links or just relative one's?? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Del.icio.us
Digg
Google
Spurl
Blink
Furl
Simpy
Y! MyWeb
.
Linear Mode
