|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
 |
|||||||||
| |
||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |
||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
 |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
SEO Chat Forums Sponsor:
|
|
|
|
#16
March 4th, 2004, 09:49 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well said requiem!
|
|
#17
March 5th, 2004, 12:13 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
good point....but its no different than what goes on every day at a site like epinions.com ...for example...if it relates to the facts of an experience you had....then its fair game. all seochat needs to do is get themselves one of those 'disclaimers' ...like... 'the opinions expressed by our members is not necessarily that of the management."
__________________
columbus ohio architect | columbus ohio web site designer | sussex county new jersey business directory | columbus ohio Last edited by relaxzoolander : March 9th, 2004 at 08:14 PM.
|
|
#18
March 5th, 2004, 12:21 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
...maybe requiem should have included a definition for 'plagiarism' too. ----> http://freeadvice.com/law/576us.htm 
|
|
#19
March 5th, 2004, 01:14 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Which is what legally? I think saying things like: Quote:
surely is beyond "fair critique". Anhoo, why risk it? I understand people's statements, and I know what you all say is probably correct, but a law suit, even one you win, is a waste of both time and money. Forget legalities, forget justifications, the best thing people can do is keep it general. Why make oneself a target, not just legally but physically? Besides, it is much better to talk in generalities, simply because the general principals will always be similar, but specifics only educate about one instance. I just mention all because it is often assummed in forums that we are all friends at a pub, and anything ggoes. Not so, and in a litigious society, better safe than sorry. Anyhoo, just my $0.02.
__________________
Internet Marketing Australia
|
|
#20
March 5th, 2004, 03:26 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
i aint no attorney...but i seen 'my cousin vinny' over 100 times.
|
|
#22
March 5th, 2004, 07:31 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
requiem...whatever. i didnt see you race to correct pk when he made this comment about your 'genius' post. you are doing some fancy backpeddling now that you are 'busted' though. Last edited by relaxzoolander : March 9th, 2004 at 08:15 PM.
|
|
#23
March 6th, 2004, 04:26 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
yes...i have issues with plagiarism.
Last edited by relaxzoolander : March 9th, 2004 at 08:14 PM.
|
|
#24
March 6th, 2004, 11:27 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Unless, of course you happen to be the government. In that case, even when true, one can be charged with sedition. Now that's a real bummer! A thought-provoking post, requiem. Way to go!!!
|
|
#25
March 7th, 2004, 07:47 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I have no idea as well as no legal background. I just know a BS law when I see it and any law that surpresses the truth is BS.
|
|
#26
March 8th, 2004, 01:44 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
perhaps it would be nice to pass that gratitude along to the true author of requiems post here: http://freeadvice.com/law/576us.htm Last edited by relaxzoolander : March 9th, 2004 at 08:19 PM. Reason: make love not war.
|
|
#27
March 9th, 2004, 12:52 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
*Sigh*
I don't like the way this threads going guys. If you want to flame each other please do so privately. Noone else wants to hear it. If you have a problem with requiem relaxzoolander then please take it privately or elsewhere. Lets all make love, not war ;-) Back on topic. I agree with projectphp on this one. Not so much due to the threat of litigation, but because it is unfair to bad mouth a company where they dont have the opportunity to defend themselves. There is ALWAYS two sides to every story and I simply dont feel it is fair; even if there is clear evidence of perceived wrong doing; to slag anyone down without them having the chance to respond. I'm going to ask in the mod forum what admins policy is on this and act accordingly. If this thread disapears dont be surprised. Alan
|
|
#28
March 9th, 2004, 08:03 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
To be safe rather than sorry I would go after the practice not the practicer
"Unlimited Doorway / Gateway Pages * Include thousands of keywords and key-phrases on your site without overloading the engines. * Dynamically generate doorway pages which automatically forward all traffic straight to your home page! Passing Lane PLUS is a Hosted Solution * PLUS includes full web hosting services! * May be used as your primary web site, or to send additional traffic to your site anywhere on the Internet! * With 2 web sites, you can actually compete against yourself in the TOP 10! Upgrade to Daily Submissions for only $100 more!" I think that these practices are scams, and look this website seems to promote them, should you use these practices which are scams NO! Should you use firms that promote them, that decision is up to you based on what you know about their practices. As for this thread, except for the flaming I think it is useful to users and does not constitute a case against SEO Chat in any way shape or form.
__________________
Webmasters who spend their energies upholding the spirit of the basic principles [Of Google] will provide a much better user experience and subsequently enjoy better ranking than those who spend their time looking for loopholes they can exploit. Google.com Real Estate Forum
|
|
#30
April 5th, 2004, 01:46 PM
|
|||
|
Del.icio.us
Digg
Google
Spurl
Blink
Furl
Simpy
Y! MyWeb
