Search Engine Optimization
 
Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
 
 
User Name:
Password:
Remember me
Go Back   SEO Chat ForumsSearch Engine StrategiesSearch Engine Optimization

Reply
Add This Thread To:
  Del.icio.us   Digg   Google   Spurl   Blink   Furl   Simpy   Y! MyWeb 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
 
Unread SEO Chat Forums Sponsor:
  #1  
Old March 19th, 2003, 07:26 PM
thewatcher's Avatar
thewatcher thewatcher is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 438 thewatcher User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 7 h 6 m 58 sec
Reputation Power: 6
real pr 10

http://www.pr10.com/

hot stuff!

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old March 19th, 2003, 07:52 PM
nastynation nastynation is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 475 nastynation User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: < 1 sec
Reputation Power: 6
Send a message via AIM to nastynation
__________________
The Nasty Nation *OR* Project Nuke

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old March 19th, 2003, 08:20 PM
Darrin Ward's Avatar
Darrin Ward Darrin Ward is offline
Founder, SEOChat.com :)
SEO Chat Beginner (1000 - 1499 posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 1,439 Darrin Ward User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)Darrin Ward User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)Darrin Ward User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)Darrin Ward User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 17 h 5 m 20 sec
Reputation Power: 11
I've seen these before!!

Some great joke tips on the page ..

Be sure to do the opposite of everything on that page!
__________________
Darrin J. Ward, a Professional SEO Consultant and Original Founder of SEO Chat (this site), Google Dance Tool & some other cool stuff!

* Rankings Reporter - Track your Website's Keyword Rankings in Google & Yahoo.

* ChatButton - Free AJAX Chatboxes to embed onto any Webpage - super-easy copy/paste setup!.

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old March 19th, 2003, 08:34 PM
thewatcher's Avatar
thewatcher thewatcher is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 438 thewatcher User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 7 h 6 m 58 sec
Reputation Power: 6
i guess there are some lucky n00bs here Darrin, if it wasn't for you i am sure that they would of at least tried some of these tips..

remember, just because google has over 50 phd's doesn't mean they will figure out the #00ff33 trick ;)

"the old 00ff33 trick hey?"

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old March 19th, 2003, 09:26 PM
Blake Blake is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 89 Blake User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: < 1 sec
Reputation Power: 6
Quote:
Google only indexes the first 101K of the document - so don't use TOO many.


Is this true?

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old March 19th, 2003, 10:50 PM
thewatcher's Avatar
thewatcher thewatcher is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 438 thewatcher User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 7 h 6 m 58 sec
Reputation Power: 6
yes tis' true.. (thanks to Darrin)

BUT the smaller your page size the better...

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old March 20th, 2003, 12:41 AM
Darrin Ward's Avatar
Darrin Ward Darrin Ward is offline
Founder, SEOChat.com :)
SEO Chat Beginner (1000 - 1499 posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 1,439 Darrin Ward User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)Darrin Ward User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)Darrin Ward User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)Darrin Ward User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 17 h 5 m 20 sec
Reputation Power: 11
Actually it is true that Google only indexes the first 101k of documents. This is an attempt to conserve storage at their end. There are 4 points to this logic:

1. If something is more than 101k down the page then it's not too useful to the user and must not be important.

2. It will save a vast quantity of storage on their behalf. There are plenty of 1 Meg+ HTML pages out there!

3. It will save bandwidth (data transferred), meaning they will have lower costs.

4. Given that there would be an over all less amount of data to be parsed, it would be possible to stick to a 30 day update cycle.

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old March 20th, 2003, 12:57 AM
mario's Avatar
mario mario is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Spain
Posts: 329 mario User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 2 m 31 sec
Reputation Power: 6
Quote:
Make sure you include at least one link to Google.


do you see any advantage or disadvantage on this "trick"?
__________________
best regards... mario

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old March 20th, 2003, 01:00 AM
thewatcher's Avatar
thewatcher thewatcher is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 438 thewatcher User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 7 h 6 m 58 sec
Reputation Power: 6
alot of people believe in this, i for one don't think that you will achieve anything out of this but it is nice to send a little free traffic to your favourite search engine ;)

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old March 20th, 2003, 01:22 AM
Blake Blake is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 89 Blake User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: < 1 sec
Reputation Power: 6
Quote:
Originally posted by "Darrin Ward"

Actually it is true that Google only indexes the first 101k of documents. This is an attempt to conserve storage at their end. There are 4 points to this logic:

1. If something is more than 101k down the page then it's not too useful to the user and must not be important.

2. It will save a vast quantity of storage on their behalf. There are plenty of 1 Meg+ HTML pages out there!

3. It will save bandwidth (data transferred), meaning they will have lower costs.

4. Given that there would be an over all less amount of data to be parsed, it would be possible to stick to a 30 day update cycle.


Does this include images or is that discarded? Is it only text?

Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old March 20th, 2003, 03:47 AM
robert's Avatar
robert robert is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bucharest / Romania
Posts: 119 robert User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 3 h 30 sec
Reputation Power: 6
Send a message via Yahoo to robert
Just the HTML page gets crawled by Googlebot.

What would Google understand from the pictures I took last summer in Transylvania?

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old March 20th, 2003, 06:53 AM
thewatcher's Avatar
thewatcher thewatcher is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 438 thewatcher User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 7 h 6 m 58 sec
Reputation Power: 6
the question he was asking robert was "are the images included in the 101k cached"

i would say that the images are not included, but they are spidered and they relate that image to the keyterm of the page and the alt tags...

if that makes any sense

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old March 20th, 2003, 07:19 AM
robert's Avatar
robert robert is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bucharest / Romania
Posts: 119 robert User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 3 h 30 sec
Reputation Power: 6
Send a message via Yahoo to robert
I don't think the are spidered. my logs shows only HTML pages downloaded by Googlebot.

It's true, the page is analysed after and the images are related to their alt tag and/or title and/or href. But defenetely not included in the cached copy. When displayed in Google "q=cache:tXw8ZgiZ....." it uses a BASE tag to get the images.

Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old March 20th, 2003, 12:04 PM
digit18 digit18 is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 44 digit18 User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: < 1 sec
Reputation Power: 6
Does this mean that web pages >101k do not get a "cached" link on google results?

Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old March 20th, 2003, 01:35 PM
robert's Avatar
robert robert is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bucharest / Romania
Posts: 119 robert User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 3 h 30 sec
Reputation Power: 6
Send a message via Yahoo to robert
IMO, if Google gets pages larger than 100 K it will stop the parser when the limit is reached. But I don't know if it gets cached.

I don't know if it makes any difference if the page is cached or not by google. If you worry about this, it means that you worry about the uptime of your server and in this case I suggest you should change your hosting provider .

Reply With Quote
Reply

Viewing: SEO Chat ForumsSearch Engine StrategiesSearch Engine Optimization > real pr 10


Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes  Rate This Thread 
Rate This Thread:


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
View Your Warnings | New Posts | Latest News | Latest Threads | Shoutbox
Forum Jump