Great community. Great ideas.

Welcome to SEOChat, a community dedicated to helping beginners and professionals alike in improving their Search Engine Optimization knowledge.  Sign up today to gain access to the combined insight of tens of thousands of members.

Thread: Google: Disavowing isn't enough!

Results 1 to 3 of 3
Share This Thread →
  1. #1
    thegodfather's Avatar
    thegodfather is offline In the game since Jan '06 SEO Chat Good Citizen (1000 - 1499 posts)
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Devon, UK
    Posts
    1,121
    Rep Power
    476

    Google: Disavowing isn't enough!

    Self-explanatory really, Google is reinforcing the fact that using the disavow tool is no substitute for removing the links yourself.

    I haven't actually had to use the disavow tool myself yet, but for everyone's info:

    http://searchengineland.com/google-d...removal-138149

    But given the seemingly automated nature of the disavow link tool, did site owners really need to go through this effort? Why not just submit a list of bad links and save the time? Isn’t that really all you need to do? According to the head of Google’s web spam team, Matt Cutts, no:

    "I wouldn’t count on this. In particular, Google can look at the snapshot of links we saw when we took manual action. If we don’t see any links actually taken down off the web, then we can see that sites have been disavowing without trying to get the links taken down."
    The best course of action is to both remove and disavow according to the article, don't rely on just one (not official, the author's interpretation):

    Hit By Manual Action? Don’t Mess Around: Both Remove & Disavow

    I think the reality is two-fold, however. First, many of the sites impacted by things like the Penguin Update and seeking to remove bad links may have many of them, so that by removing a few, the link disavow tool can help as part of an overall clean-up effort

    Second, I actually think the link disavow tool isn’t trying to do some type of cross-checking. If you were hit by an automated action like Penguin based on your backlinks, rather than a manual action, I suspect that just disavowing those bad links (if you can tell what they are) will be sufficient. If you read the comments from Cutts closely, his statement is more about what Google could do, not what it necessarily does.

    But having said that, his is the official advice, and so if you think you were hit by a penalty, I’d follow it fully. Try to remove some of those links manually.

    Moreover, if you were hit by a manual action, where you know some human at Google has penalized yourself, you’re going to be under even more scrutiny when filing a reinclusion request. That means you’ll want to know that if a Google web spam team member checks on their site, they’ll see you’ve done more than just disavow links.
    "In 1969 I gave up women and alcohol - it was the worst 20 minutes of my life." - George Best
    LinkedIn: uk.linkedin.com/in/dklein89

  2. #2
    AfterhoursSEO is offline Registered User SEO Chat Explorer (0 - 99 posts)
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Calgary, AB, Canada
    Posts
    5
    Rep Power
    0
    The best course of action is to both remove and disavow according to the article, don't rely on just one (not official, the author's interpretation):[/QUOTE]

    Moving forward it will be interesting to hear how webmasters are doing with this new tool. I guess a lot will depend on how they regard its use and what efforts they make themselves at the outset. Great post!

    Peace

  3. #3
    bolainmarsh4 is offline Registered User SEO Chat Explorer (0 - 99 posts)
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1
    Rep Power
    0
    It is good to know about it on the other side I really do not understand this hype that they are creating for this feature. It is just a feature to remove the reference of the link that they had considered it to be a SPAM, which is any how must to have feature for them in web master tools. I would say personalyl google is always a headache for everyone, including all website owners. Improvements in name of bug fixing. Waiting for a better search eng... ;-)

Share This Thread →

Become Part of This Conversation

Join NowFor Free!

Similar Threads

  1. Ranking high on chat keywords
    By southpole854 in forum Public Site Reviews
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: Mar 12th, 2008, 12:55 PM
  2. Google says you don’t need a web site any more
    By karma_killer in forum Search Engine Optimization
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Nov 8th, 2006, 05:47 AM
  3. Is there any Hope for Google.
    By Hawaii in forum Google Optimization
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: Oct 23rd, 2005, 02:26 PM
  4. The Google Crash Theory
    By iceglobe in forum Google Optimization
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: Jun 12th, 2003, 05:16 AM

SEO Chat Advertisers and Affiliates