|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |
||
| |||||||||
![]() |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Density Of Keyword
Hi to all
Can you tell me What should be optimal density of two phrase keywords? Thanks in advance. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
There's no such set keyword density you can shoot for to help with SEO. Just write naturally (visitor friendly). |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think it's you should repeat it about 5-10 times in an article (500-1500 words) in a natural manner. And to have the first occurrence as close as possible to the start of the article.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
As has been proved time and time again, keyword density (no matter what your preferred percentage is) makes no difference to rankings. All it does is force you to create content that reads unnaturally, turning off visitors in the process.
__________________
... I'll be back for breakfast
New to SEO? SEOChat SEO FAQsForum Rules and Posting Guidelines URL canonicalization code solutions Vigorously pursuing the floccinaucinihilipilification of cheap SEO tricks
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
So where does your set percentage of 0.33% to 2% (according to numbers above) come from? Anything you set like this can mess with your natural writing without providing any benefit. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Many webmasters (lower case "w" is intentional) seem to think that if one instance of their key phrase is good, then 500 instances must be better. That was true to some extent several years ago, but not anymore.
Now that the more advanced search engines employ latent semantic indexing, there's simply no benefit to spamming the SE's because the SE's are applying filters to over optimized sites. Do your level best to write content that sounds natural when read aloud and you'll be fine. Rule of thumb? try to keep your keyword density between 2 and 5% and you should be okay. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Great except for this part. Why any set keyword density at all? As long as an article reads natural, why should you have to raise or lower the number of times the keywords appear in order to fit in some arbitrary range? |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
You started great and ended pushing untruthful specifics. 2 and 5% is no better than 0.5% or 10% or 0% or 100% The "RULE OF THUMB" what ever it is, that's best! Writing and then measuring changes nothing, and intentionally editing to make it seem that "something is better"... is total, pure, absolute 100% inaccruate SEO Bull**** Dogmat!
__________________
We are what we repeatedly do… excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit. — Aristotle |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Since you asked about the "optimum density" clearly you don't understand it all that well... but you'll learn if you keep asking questions. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Yes i just wanted to know about the effect of keyword density in SEO. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
put a keyword in the title element [once] put a keyword in the page title [once] having a keyword in body text, alt tags or page urls are optional - together these don't do much... technically those points have absolutely nothing to do with density - optimal or otherwise... It's like saying "gas" made you speed and get a speeding ticket... you can argue that with "no gas" there is "NO WAY" for you to get a speeding ticket... but that isn't really what occurred. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
As long as your keywords appear in your title, header and URl,I think worrying about on page keyword density is not a big deal
Some people quote 3 to 7% I have found that LSI is actually as relevant as keyword density |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
So you're saying that LSI is an equally worthless measurement? |
|
#14
|
|
|
|