|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |
||
| |||||||||
![]() |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Back Linking for Quality?
Is it better to have many back links from PR0 sites or just a couple from PR6 sites?
Dan |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If we are talking about relevant content sites in both cases then a couple of PR6 is usually better. But it is good to get a variety of keywords from different PR ranking pages. This way the search engines will not trace the linking pattern as easy. Thank you Dmitriy |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
to sum it up...
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Depends on your purpose.
If you are trying to gain PR then - relevancy is not a factor,go for any kind of high PR sites. If you are trying to gain some good ranking in search engine - relevancy is the important thing,focus on that.PR is an added advantage. If you are trying to gain some traffic - focus on any of the above mentioned kind of links, but relevant sites can drive loyal visitors to your site. Now select which one you prefer.
__________________
360° Marketing - Customers through Content! |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
There are exceptions of course..... But it is quite difficult to get a link from a PR6 webpage so I certainly would not be knocking one back. As to relevance you can make a link 'more relevant' by linking it to your 'most relevant' interrnal page. So if a good link is on offer consider writing an article that combines the relevance of the two sites. ie a PR6 link from a dog food site to and education site can have its relevance increased if you add an article on the education site abount 'educating your dog/ dog training' and than get the link to link to this page. Just something I always do now is if I get a new link from a PR0 page I go and social bookmark the page the link is on. This is a way of getting someones elses page out of supps.
__________________
Live the moment |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
no need to worry if there's alot of backlinks coming from PR 0 sites, especially if you wanted to get high rankings for aslong as it is related to your site .
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Don't worry about PR, i think better alwasy this about relevance.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Its better to have PR 0 from a related site rather than PR 6 from a non relevant site.
__________________
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
well, the very best is a combination ... get a lot of variation, remember your link profile has to look natural ;-)
|
![]() |
| Viewing: SEO Chat Forums > Search Engine Strategies > Link Popularity > Back Linking for Quality? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
|
|