
July 25th, 2003, 05:53 AM
|
 |
Back to Reality!
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
|
|
|
difficult question to anawer Maneesh. The data source will always have a margin of error e.g. +/- 25%.
A good example of this is Wordtracker - keyword results uses metacrawler usage to provide a baseline for usage to identify global use.
This is then superimposed onto market shares (searches) by each search engine - not a direct feed.
The factual "use" results could be out by 50% but this isn't "targeted use" but all uses.
e.g. webmasters/SEO manually and automatically checking their ranks (or client ranks) are included in this results - but likely not to visit your site... right?
I have seen ratings at 300 uses per day in Google have client listings at #1 and #2, plus AdWords, and Premium listings and produce 10 per month where theoretically the term should be pushing 9K.
Others say 0 and provide 20 per day.
Tools assist in decision-making but they don't offer absolute answers! ;)
Last edited by fathom : July 25th, 2003 at 05:59 AM.
|