HTML Coding
 
Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
 
 
User Name:
Password:
Remember me
Go Back   SEO Chat ForumsOtherHTML Coding

Reply
Add This Thread To:
  Del.icio.us   Digg   Google   Spurl   Blink   Furl   Simpy   Y! MyWeb 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
 
Unread SEO Chat Forums Sponsor:
  #1  
Old August 27th, 2003, 04:18 AM
relaxzoolander's Avatar
relaxzoolander relaxzoolander is offline
web designer
SEO Chat Frequenter (2500 - 2999 posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: designing a web site in columbus ohio
Posts: 2,993 relaxzoolander User rank is Private First Class (20 - 50 Reputation Level)relaxzoolander User rank is Private First Class (20 - 50 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 3 h 49 m 3 sec
Reputation Power: 8
Question redirecting wap without distrupting search engines

using asp to detect a wap device...

it has been suggested that one can use the http_user_agent variable to determine if someone has reached a web site with a wap device.

if the results for http_user_agent contains 'mozilla' then its not a wap device.

first of all...can anyone confirm this method.

secondly...will google or any other search engines show 'mozilla' in their results for http_user_agent?

one of my google hits shows this for google:
Googlebot/2.1 (+http://www.googlebot.com/bot.html)


another method suggested is to check for the http_accept variable.

...if 'text/vnd.wap.wml' is in the list...then its a wap device.

which of these methods is the best?
is there another method?
my main concern is to prevent redirecting search engine spiders that reach my site. i only wish to redirect wap devices to a different version.
any comments are appreciated.

thanks!

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old August 27th, 2003, 04:54 AM
Ralphyboy Ralphyboy is offline
Registered User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 4 Ralphyboy User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 m 57 sec
Reputation Power: 0
Re

Hi,

I would definitely go for the http_accept - variant.
The user - agent variant has the following flaws:

* some spiders might not reveal their true identity but rather mask as a "normal" browser, possibly to check if you're cloaking

* There might be browsers that do not have "Mozilla" in their User-Agent-Value

Regards
Ralph

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old August 28th, 2003, 11:08 PM
relaxzoolander's Avatar
relaxzoolander relaxzoolander is offline
web designer
SEO Chat Frequenter (2500 - 2999 posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: designing a web site in columbus ohio
Posts: 2,993 relaxzoolander User rank is Private First Class (20 - 50 Reputation Level)relaxzoolander User rank is Private First Class (20 - 50 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 3 h 49 m 3 sec
Reputation Power: 8
Wink

yep....
thats my gut feeling.

i have been watching the http_accept results....
and i dont see any spiders showing up with 'text/vnd.wap.wml'.
so it seems safe to use.

thanks. :-D

Reply With Quote
Reply

Viewing: SEO Chat ForumsOtherHTML Coding > redirecting wap without distrupting search engines


Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes  Rate This Thread 
Rate This Thread:


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
View Your Warnings | New Posts | Latest News | Latest Threads | Shoutbox
Forum Jump


Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
  
 





© 2003-2008 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 5 hosted by Hostway
Stay green...Green IT