|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |
||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
Quote:
Sorry mate... you can't say "I'm wrong" - by pure guesswork show me "a single confirmation of CTR increase because a Meta Decription of the extreme wordsmith quality... were you can also show a decline in CTR when you removed it." If you can do that... you are a better researcher than me and the 100 or so SEOs that have tried "and failed". If you can't... then how can you assume your are correct? The problem with you "common sense"... it sounds good - it's "too good to be true in fact". The thing is... If you've ever stop to try to test this you are met with a few common issues. 1. seasonal changesThe biggest problem you are stuck with... "IF" a meta description changes anything it doesn't impact like "wow 1,000 additional vsitors clicks" to "that sucks - I lost 1000 visitors because I removed a quality Meta Description"... and all the changes noted above can affect clicks at that noted level... so how do you remove these unrelated issues to prove that your theory is correct? Your position really comes down to "it doesn't really matter enough" to make sure I am correct." If you can't substaniate your claim to any degree of certainty... did it do anything at all? In other threads I pointed out the issues with conversions. Quote:
Wow you actually agree with me... so how can you assume I'm wrong if you can't prove it? Quote:
...I agree... and you also get them with organic results... so how does that support any claim? Quote:
That's the point... I did for 6 months... and it was a waste of time... and why everyone needs to ignore your advice. Quote:
Maybe... but what if you're wrong and it's the fact that the Meta Description can't replace real page content for every phrase and your problem is you hide you content issues that you can easily see behind a great Meta Description? Google Supports this - they recently noted 20% of all daily searches have never been used before or not seen in the past 120 days... and you can be sure most of this 20% isn't in your meta decription... so "if" your belief are correct... and Meta Descreiption actually does improve something... you are also saying you are losing this 20% right off the top... and because is it a "proven fact" that most longtail phrases are money terms... you are losing sales because you think CTR is improved on non-money terms.
__________________
Fathom @ Twitter "We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act, but a habit." -- Aristotle Last edited by fathom : June 10th, 2009 at 05:48 PM. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I just noted this... but of course you will BS to them about the added value? Go figure. Why not point them to this thread so they can make up their own mind? ...I suppose that is too risky to? I don't really care... about your customers DON'T offer Meta Description advice here if you can't be bother to prove anything on your own test domains. |
![]() |
| Viewing: SEO Chat Forums > Other > HTML Coding > How to create Meta tags?? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
|
|