March 20th, 2008, 08:00 AM
|
 |
Service with a smile :)
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Varna, Bulgaria
Posts: 174
Time spent in forums: 1 Day 16 h 8 m 44 sec
Reputation Power: 1
|
|
I don't mind searching the internet instead of you, but some basic answers and opinions about certain things can be found using Mr. G. Also, I'm afraid no correct answer can be given in the difference between the coding. My personal look on things, is closely to Reed's opinion. Back in the 90s I used to pay something like 1$ for one hour of internet, having in mind 1$ was a lot here back in the time, using a dial-up modem which is blocking my phone line, having insane telephone bills etc. That's what Web 1.0 was, you can compare it to the 1-7 years human phase.
Web 2.0 would be 7-18, and Web 3.0 - 18+. I guess there will come a day when the internet will be over, and something new will appear.. similar, under a new name.
Another aspect of Web 3.0 will be the increased artificial intelligence of machines, search engines are going the semantic way (Latent Semantic Optimization, and LSI methods), robots are starting to write instead of us, machines are translating instead of people. I'm very unhappy about all the incoming things that awaits human kind. One day only a word will be needed to design a very good looking and unique picture, where the designers will go? Will Photography be dead? Will book authors just dissapear? Got to know?
There are the quotations on Web 3.0:
Quote: | Originally Posted by Tim Berners-Lee People keep asking what Web 3.0 is. I think maybe when you've got an overlay of scalable vector graphics - everything rippling and folding and looking misty - on Web 2.0 and access to a semantic Web integrated across a huge space of data, you'll have access to an unbelievable data resource. |
Quote: | Originally Posted by Eric Schmidt At the Seoul Digital Forum in May 2007, Eric Schmidt, CEO of Google, was asked to define Web 2.0 and Web 3.0.[3] He responded:
Web 2.0 is a marketing term, and I think you've just invented Web 3.0.
But if I were to guess what Web 3.0 is, I would tell you that it's a different way of building applications... My prediction would be that Web 3.0 will ultimately be seen as applications which are pieced together. There are a number of characteristics: the applications are relatively small, the data is in the cloud, the applications can run on any device, PC or mobile phone, the applications are very fast and they're very customizable. Furthermore, the applications are distributed virally: literally by social networks, by email. You won't go to the store and purchase them... That's a very different application model than we've ever seen in computing. |
Quote: | Originally Posted by Jerry Yang At the Technet Summit in November 2006, Jerry Yang, founder and Chief of Yahoo, stated [2]:
Web 2.0 is well documented and talked about. The power of the Net reached a critical mass, with capabilities that can be done on a network level. We are also seeing richer devices over last four years and richer ways of interacting with the network, not only in hardware like game consoles and mobile devices, but also in the software layer. You don't have to be a computer scientist to create a program. We are seeing that manifest in Web 2.0 and 3.0 will be a great extension of that, a true communal medium…the distinction between professional, semi-professional and consumers will get blurred, creating a network effect of business and applications. |
Quote: | Originally Posted by Reed Hastings At the same Technet Summit, Reed Hastings, founder and CEO of Netflix, stated a simpler formula for defining the phases of the Web:
Web 1.0 was dial-up, 50K average bandwidth, Web 2.0 is an average 1 megabit of bandwidth and Web 3.0 will be 10 megabits of bandwidth all the time, which will be the full video Web, and that will feel like Web 3.0. |
Last edited by icetrax : March 20th, 2008 at 09:24 AM.
Reason: Typos.
|
SEO Chat Forums Sponsor:
Del.icio.us
Digg
Google
Spurl
Blink
Furl
Simpy
Y! MyWeb
Linear Mode
