|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
 |
|||||||||
| |
||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |
||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
 |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
SEO Chat Forums Sponsor:
|
|
|
|
#1
June 28th, 2007, 03:30 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Breadcrumb Navigation
Having migrated to CSS design this past year, I have been interested in the benefits of breadcrumb navigation. I searched the Forum and only found threads from 2003. Have things changed?
For usability, I am finding in my reading that a breadcrumb under the title of the article is best. For SEO, does it matter on the location? I want my content to be spidered as thoroughly as possible. What are your thoughts?
|
|
#2
June 28th, 2007, 03:33 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think if it's on the page the bot will find it and crawl it. Put it where it makes the human's stay more pleasurable.
__________________
Keyword Meta Questions Answered HTAccess Redirects Adversity is a spice when added to life makes the dish more interesting. A magic marker is a SEO's "Easy Button".
|
|
#5
June 28th, 2007, 10:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Most directories... e.g. click to higher categories in the same tree from lower ones. dmoz.org has 600,000+ crumb trails.
__________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act, but a habit." -- Aristotle
|
|
| Viewing: SEO Chat Forums > Other > HTML Coding > Breadcrumb Navigation |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Del.icio.us
Digg
Google
Spurl
Blink
Furl
Simpy
Y! MyWeb
Linear Mode
