Great community. Great ideas.

Welcome to SEOChat, a community dedicated to helping beginners and professionals alike in improving their Search Engine Optimization knowledge.  Sign up today to gain access to the combined insight of tens of thousands of members.

Thread: reminding google of your backlinks

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 46
Share This Thread →
  1. #1
    games-seo's Avatar
    games-seo is offline Contributing User SEO Chat Discoverer (100 - 499 posts)
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    185
    Rep Power
    8

    reminding google of your backlinks

    What's the best way to do this legitimately?

    I mean, using www.submitexpress.com/linkpop , google and inktomi think there are only 21 for my site, but msn, av, yahoo, alltheweb all see 800+. Which kind of does my head in as it actually matters more to google and inktomi than the others.

    Do I post a list somewhere, (but won't that get penalised)? I don't want to go down the cheap shot road, any suggestions?
    Last edited by Wit; Oct 15th, 2005 at 11:49 AM. Reason: No live links in posts please

  2. #2
    marcO's Avatar
    marcO is offline rubik's cube - 34 secs SEO Chat Adventurer (500 - 999 posts)
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    820
    Rep Power
    16
    Google will pick up your links, but only show a selection of them.

  3. #3
    Bruno's Avatar
    Bruno is offline Croatia - Hrvatska SEO Chat Skiller (1500 - 1999 posts)
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Croatia - Hrvatska
    Posts
    1,891
    Rep Power
    13
    maybe script got errror or something

  4. #4
    HN Will's Avatar
    HN Will is offline Contributing User SEO Chat Discoverer (100 - 499 posts)
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    250
    Rep Power
    8
    "Google will pick up your links, but only show a selection of them."

    yep - that's right. But i've always been curious why they show certain links vs. others. I'm sure there's a related thread on this here somewhere so i'll look for it...

  5. #5
    mrkryz03 is offline Contributing User SEO Chat Discoverer (100 - 499 posts)
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    143
    Rep Power
    8
    The reason google shows a subset of all backlinks is to make it much more difficult to determine the weight of backlinks in SERPS and PR. They use random sampling so that the "weight" of particularly relevant backlinked sites can not be easily determined and then exploited.

    For example if I know that "blahbla.com" is #1 SERP and it has 1000 backlinks I can script the results and grab the PR and link structure to each site so I can more easily compete. Especially given G's priority of links over content, this is a smoke screen to diffuse all the "Page Rank Prediction" scripts and analytical link popularity->SERP scripts
    Comments on this post
    • games-seo → agrees: gave me the answer

  6. #6
    HN Will's Avatar
    HN Will is offline Contributing User SEO Chat Discoverer (100 - 499 posts)
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    250
    Rep Power
    8
    hmmm....interesting. And checking those BLs on Yahoo and MSN won't give you the same kind of data....good call.

    I'm sure there's an algorithm, then, that G uses to display the BLs. Has anyone ever done a study comparing the Yahoo/MSN BLs to Google BLs while noting the PR of the pages that get left out of G's BLs?

  7. #7
    mrkryz03 is offline Contributing User SEO Chat Discoverer (100 - 499 posts)
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    143
    Rep Power
    8
    I dont know of any articulate studies on the differences of the major SE's backlink publications however there is one thing to remember with G. They place an unholy amount of importance on backlinks. That said, they also have multiple tiers of "weight" based on the source of the backlink in regard to category/topic relevance and the backlinking sites own backlink heirarchy. This extends well beyond the Pagerank of the site and the details of the algorithim will be published the day after the Kennedy Assasination truth and what Area 51 is really used for

  8. #8
    HN Will's Avatar
    HN Will is offline Contributing User SEO Chat Discoverer (100 - 499 posts)
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    250
    Rep Power
    8
    Yeah, they have such an overwhelmingly huge amount data to write those kind of algorithms.....here comes Google OS - the world will never be the same again.

  9. #9
    TopSeoExperts is offline Contributing User SEO Chat Explorer (0 - 99 posts)
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    36
    Rep Power
    0

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by HN Will
    "Google will pick up your links, but only show a selection of them."

    yep - that's right. But i've always been curious why they show certain links vs. others. I'm sure there's a related thread on this here somewhere so i'll look for it...
    Regarding your question actually google will show only links from pages of PR=>4 that's it.

  10. #10
    lorien1973 is offline Contributing User SEO Chat Discoverer (100 - 499 posts)
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    The plywood state
    Posts
    366
    Rep Power
    11
    Quote Originally Posted by TopSeoExperts
    Regarding your question actually google will show only links from pages of PR=>4 that's it.
    Not true at all. It shows a random sample. PR is not a factor.

  11. #11
    rmccarley's Avatar
    rmccarley is offline SEO Earthquake! SEO Chat Scholar (3000 - 3499 posts)
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    3,307
    Rep Power
    20
    Right PR has nothing to do with it. At all. Period.

    The OP did spark an interesting idea for me.

    What about setting up a blogger account with links pointing to the pages that link to you? This would not only "remind" the SEs of your BLs but even give them a tiny bit extra link power. The key to this would be to make sure you don't link to any bad neighborhoods.

    I think I'll give it a try.
    14th Colony: The hardest working websites online!

    Looking for links? Join the Union and don't miss English Grammar rules, tips and explanations

  12. #12
    TopSeoExperts is offline Contributing User SEO Chat Explorer (0 - 99 posts)
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    36
    Rep Power
    0

    Wink

    Quote Originally Posted by lorien1973
    Not true at all. It shows a random sample. PR is not a factor.
    Can You Prove that for us? If you find one or two sites with pr<4 that means it is not re-indexed by google after the pr update but usually all sites are of pr4.

  13. #13
    HN Will's Avatar
    HN Will is offline Contributing User SEO Chat Discoverer (100 - 499 posts)
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    250
    Rep Power
    8
    I'd be curious to see the proof that the BLs google lists are PR >=4. If anything I was thinking that G hides the big PR sites to make our jobs harder...
    Ruby on Rails Hosting - info for the Ruby on Rails crowd. w/ integrated AJAX/Javascript effects - demos & tutorials
    Free SEO - exhaustive SEO analysis report - Google API checks and honest rebuke.
    Link Trading - instant.
    Rails Hosting company - if you want a place to ride.

  14. #14
    rmccarley's Avatar
    rmccarley is offline SEO Earthquake! SEO Chat Scholar (3000 - 3499 posts)
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    3,307
    Rep Power
    20
    Really - PR has nothing to do with which BLs G displays.

  15. #15
    Bruno's Avatar
    Bruno is offline Croatia - Hrvatska SEO Chat Skiller (1500 - 1999 posts)
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Croatia - Hrvatska
    Posts
    1,891
    Rep Power
    13
    Can You Prove that for us?
    check for 10 site on G, M and Y and you will see something like this:

    Y: 2000 BL
    M: 1500 BL
    G: 4 bL
    and you will for every site see that G shows nothing

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Share This Thread →

Become Part of This Conversation

Join NowFor Free!

Similar Threads

  1. Domain name infringement email from google
    By notanotherseo in forum Search Engine Optimization
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: Jun 14th, 2007, 01:37 PM
  2. Booble.com's response to Google
    By Sam I Am in forum Google Optimization
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: Sep 15th, 2006, 10:18 PM
  3. Why I fear Google sitemaps...
    By rjonesx in forum Google Optimization
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: Aug 27th, 2005, 01:01 AM
  4. Sandbox Detection Tool II - Revamped
    By randfish in forum Search Engine Optimization
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: Jan 11th, 2005, 04:05 PM
  5. Reality & Truth - Competative Keywords -v- Real Life Searches
    By -search-engines-web in forum Google Optimization
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Dec 27th, 2003, 05:25 PM

SEO Chat Advertisers and Affiliates