|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |
||
| |||||||||
![]() |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wikipedia
Most of keywords i typed in Google i found Wikipedia sites on top! But i checked most of Wiki sites not have backlinks maybe few and not from top pr sites! How it's possible? And Wiki sites have pr 5-6-7-8 etc. Backlinks teory not working for Wiki?
Last edited by Wise : November 21st, 2006 at 12:30 AM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Its content theory working for wiki..
If the content is genuine like wiki, and unique like anything, then just a few backlinks can do the magic. More over the interconnectivity of the pages is so awesome, that even if wiki has around 9,430,000 pages indexed, and all with unique content, very well connected, it doesnt have any problems ranking well for very high traffic keywords. So wiki is a trend setter, and rest all are just followers..may be that makes the huge difference. But yeah, theres a lot to learn from wiki. Content is the ruling king of this era atleast.. Regards
__________________
Link Diary - Build Links Fast & Easy. Similar to Linkmarket, with option of three way link exchange and anchor rotation. **"Save SEO Industry - GO VIRAL!! - Tips and Tricks ."** **"Argument wins the situation but loses the person, So dont argue until you r sure with whom are you going to.."** **"I may climb perhaps to no great heights, but I will climb alone." |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yahoo linkdomain search shows 54 million results for wikipedia.org, so they're not exactly short of backlinks either.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Indeed Wikipedia have loads of links internally and from other sites.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wikipedia must get a ton of backlinks from people using their information. They're the ultimate example of creating content people want to link to.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wiki works because of unique content, PR hardly makes a difference
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
google shows 60100 links for wikipedia and yahoo 54 million
why google count very few links? [ Last edited by acc : November 22nd, 2006 at 02:14 AM. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
For example Wiki's "en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Host" on top 2 place for word "host" in google. And "en.wikipedia.org/wiki/host" have only 50 backlinks in google. I talk about this and many other top wiki's sites. BUT i checked wiki's sites and noted that most of the wiki's backlinks is from wiki's pages! They just backlinking on each other in their network. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Two things. First, you can't rely on Google's link: command as it only ever shows a small sample fo the total backlinks. Secondly, as long as your site has good backlinks then it isn't crucial that every page does. Pages will rank just fine on internal links alone, although direct links to inner pages may help them rank even better.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
It's not about the number of backlinks. If the site belong to Google's Trusted Sites, than any page of this site has very nice scores to get nice indexing. A simple test can prove it. Imagine that hypothetically you can put some content on Wiki and on your site, simultaneously. Despite the content appeared on your site at the same time with Wiki, I give very high % that on Wiki page this content will dwell perfectly, and on your site it will be taken to supplemental results.
__________________
100% Free Link Exchange Script + Blog Experts interviewed about Blogging for Money and Hobby |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I have a doubt in this ..If i use this content first in my site and after some days in Wiki then also will the same problem arise for me?? |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
I thought google always "awards" the content where it finds it first
|
![]() |
| Viewing: SEO Chat Forums > Google > Google Optimization > Wikipedia |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
|