Great community. Great ideas.

Welcome to SEOChat, a community dedicated to helping beginners and professionals alike in improving their Search Engine Optimization knowledge.  Sign up today to gain access to the combined insight of tens of thousands of members.

  1. May 16th, 2013
    Views:
    415

Thread: A little confused with the Canonical tag

Results 1 to 7 of 7
Share This Thread →
  1. #1
    Contra is offline Contributing User SEO Chat Explorer (0 - 99 posts)
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    New Jersey, US
    Posts
    45
    Rep Power
    1

    A little confused with the Canonical tag

    I use code in my .htaccess file to 301 redirect from mysite.com to www.mysite.com.

    Also, I set www.mysite.com to the preferred page in Google WMTs.

    Should I also put a canonical tag in my actually pages? I see people talking about doing this and I am not sure if this applies to me.

  2. #2
    Jocelyn's Avatar
    Jocelyn is offline Contributing SEO Chat Hero (2000 - 2499 posts)
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Montreal / Canada
    Posts
    2,157
    Rep Power
    593
    If many versions of the same page can exist, you can use the canonical tag to set the one really to use.
    So, if you have both blabla(dot)bla/index.htm and blabla(dot)bla/ indexed, you can set one as being the one to use.
    Disclaimer : My posts on SEO are just from my observations and I do not say it is a true fact... A real fact of life is that, I'm often wrong...

  3. #3
    Ann Smarty's Avatar
    Ann Smarty is offline Administrator SEO Chat Discoverer (100 - 499 posts)
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Clifton Park, New York
    Posts
    185
    Rep Power
    273
    Here's a good article on when to implement it and when not: 5 Key Rel="Canonical" Implementation Considerations

    In your case, I'd say there's no need but read the article for more insight!
    Comments on this post
    • tstolber → agrees!
    Everything will be ok in the end

    If it's not ok, it's not the end

  4. #4
    eddyf is offline Contributing User SEO Chat Discoverer (100 - 499 posts)
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    450
    Rep Power
    497
    Interesting article Ann. Like many sites, I added canonical tags to all my pages as a "it can't hurt" strategy, even though I have a redirect set up and WMT preferred page set up.
    For these kind of on-page issues I look at the source code of several household name sites to see what they are doing. Recently I saw that Apple was using canonical tags to point a page at itself. Looking today, I no longer see the tags. Many major sites use the tag to point at itself. According to the article, Bing may have an issue with this. So, I'm on the fence as to keeping or ditching the tags. Technically they serve no purpose if you have addressed canonical issues at a higher level.

    Ed

  5. #5
    imexperttools is offline Registered User SEO Chat Explorer (0 - 99 posts)
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    19
    Rep Power
    0
    If you already 301 redirect your site from non www to www then there is no need to use the canonical tag anymore. You only use the canonical tag when there is two version of a URLs exist at once.

  6. #6
    AlexTampa's Avatar
    AlexTampa is offline Contributing User SEO Chat Good Citizen (1000 - 1499 posts)
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Outside Variable $cope
    Posts
    1,304
    Rep Power
    375
    Quote Originally Posted by imexperttools View Post
    If you already 301 redirect your site from non www to www then there is no need to use the canonical tag anymore. You only use the canonical tag when there is two version of a URLs exist at once.
    wrong

    have you ever used a CMS?


    www and non-www are NOT the only factors.

    You also have http & https

    as well as

    index.php

    && index.php?

    && index.php&nothing

    &++
    .

  7. #7
    Contra is offline Contributing User SEO Chat Explorer (0 - 99 posts)
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    New Jersey, US
    Posts
    45
    Rep Power
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by AlexTampa View Post
    wrong

    have you ever used a CMS?


    www and non-www are NOT the only factors.

    You also have http & https

    as well as

    index.php

    && index.php?

    && index.php&nothing

    &++
    I'm pretty sure he was being specific to my situation in which I am only worried about www and non-www.

Share This Thread →

Become Part of This Conversation

Join NowFor Free!

Similar Threads

  1. Canonical URL
    By ritm in forum Search Engine Optimization
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: Aug 17th, 2012, 01:27 AM
  2. Canonical fix
    By grgmathew in forum Google Optimization
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Jul 23rd, 2012, 12:11 AM
  3. Do I need a Canonical Tag?
    By RLS-SEO in forum SEO Help (General Chat)
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: Jul 16th, 2012, 07:19 AM
  4. 301 or Canonical Tag
    By Lb1878 in forum SEO Help (General Chat)
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: Nov 12th, 2011, 08:32 AM
  5. Canonical Tag
    By 24ondemand in forum Search Engine Optimization
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: Feb 7th, 2010, 09:37 PM

SEO Chat Advertisers and Affiliates