Just bought 14,000 backlinks :)

I am a lil exited since I am new to this, and this is the first time I am purchasing links..

Anyways I bought a sitewide link on a related site/forum with 14,000+ pages... main page is PR5 while some underpages is PR2-4.. but of cource mostly of the pages is PR0... but anyways: Even though a page is PR0 it will give a tiny positive boost right? And do you think this will affect my site alot?

I am competing mainly for the "poker" search term on Norwegian Google search... so its not as hard as the international "poker" search term, but still very tricky for a seo rookie...

So I am not expecting a top position or anything near it, but I am hoping for an great increasement, you think I will get that?

I think Google looks for normalicy in linkage and 14000 links in the same place on every page from one site, not in the content, doesn't seem "natural": it diffinately seems paid-for.

I think it will help more on msn than google.

I've been looking for links to buy, but I've stayed away from site-wide links.

A Link Building seminar at San Jose Search Engine Conference stressed staying under the radar, trying to act natural. Try to build as many links as high ranking competitors... but don't get them all at once. Some here and there, now and then is more natural than 14000 from one place in one day.

To be honest with you, this will probably actually hurt your current Google ranking; might help on MSN though!!!

a) 14 000 lsite wide links would be cool 3 years ago, today, that will be seen as 1, maybe 2, maybe 5, but nothing more. so basically it's a waste

b) assuming these were 14 000 one way links from different sites, hopefully you're site is 100 000 pages big so you won't get hit with a delay filter... google doesn't like huge amounts of links to appear suddenly and depending on the size of the site in question will delay accordingly.

c) for the word poker you're going to need way more than 5 links (see a)) try about... i dunno, 10 000.

hate to rain on ur parade....

Well, done is done... mabye im lucky... you think there is any chance of getting away with it? And whats the penalty? Ban? If its only decreasing my rankings, what shuld I do? Remove the link or just wait and mabye google will let me rank higher when I get a bigger site with more single backlinks?

If you've paid for it, wait and see for a while.

Yah I paid 50 bucks... thought I was a bargain... I dont care bout the money, but my rankings

How did Forest Gump say it.......is as .......does?

Write the $50 off and ask them to remove the links! The sooner the better.
Next time you want to do something that sounds too good to be true, ask the question first and then do it!

raz

That will be like the poker player who bets all in the first hand irrespective of what the hand is!

raz

Remove those fake site-wide links like... yesterday. Today, G can find blackhat just as fast as we can tell you about it.

Corr blimey!

Google needs to know once about a link - not 14,000 times

Google its not silly, he will notice that its almost impossible for a site that is new to get 14000 links in a day, i dont think even cnn or msn gets this amount in a week.. well maybe, but still this are website that has a high trust rank. Even if this links are not spam what make you think that they have the amount of quality needed to rank your website, i can tell you that i can beat your website with 100 powerfull links against your 14000 links... so next time please research about this theme first becuase in SEO all the free stuff helps better than the purchased ones....

But guys...

I see other sites at the same site who did the very same has PR2-5, mostly 5... which shuld mean that it can work? Remeber its a forum so mabye the bot dont crawl all the pages? I dunno, im a rookie lol

Question though. This cant hurt you can it. I know it wont help. but if it will hurt than whats to stop me spending $50 to hurt my competators.

I thought (maybee wrongly) that google does not peanalize for things you have no control over ie inward links.

Or are posters here suggesting that 'google bowling' is still possible.

If this wont hurt you on google will it help on MSN and Yahoo?

Do people have any answers/evidence to these questions rather than just knee jerk reactions that its bad. Not helping is not the same as hurting.

I know in the past the expirement carried out on brandell webiste did show google bowling was possible then. But it was much different from this.

So once again what penalty are people saying that google will impose for these sudden links other than ignoring them?