Google Optimization
 
Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
 
User Name:
Password:
Remember me
Go Back   SEO Chat ForumsGoogleGoogle Optimization
  • Dofollow Links From PR9 Sites (including .edu and .gov sites!!!);
  • 1-Year Link Guarantee;
  • Free 500-8,000 Submissions;
  • Campaign Absolutely Natural to Google.

BuySellLinks.com is a new Text Link Advertising Brokerage by the founder of LinkAdage that offers high-end text links and a premier membership base. We screen all advertisers and publishers and their web pages to make sure we are offering a service that works for everyone. Our plug-in is super easy to install but if you are hands off, w e offer free installation.

Tired of dealing with shady text link buyers and/or sellers? Try BuySellLinks.
Receive the tools necessary to be the rock star of your field. Our 12-month program teaches you the evolving world of multi-channel marketing as well as the complex issues and opportunities found in the industry.


Become a Member at BuySellLinks.com Now

Learn More!

Reply
Add This Thread To:
  Del.icio.us   Digg   Google   Spurl   Blink   Furl   Simpy   Y! MyWeb 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
 
Unread SEO Chat Forums Sponsor:
  #1  
Old July 10th, 2008, 10:31 AM
saet's Avatar
saet saet is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Beyond the pale
Posts: 305 saet User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)saet User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)saet User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)saet User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)saet User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Week 6 h 54 m 3 sec
Reputation Power: 13
Is this blackhat SEO?

I've found a couple of website putting 'related keywords' and lists of misspellings in their footers e.g.

'Related Keywords: insurance quote insurance south africa online insurance quotes cheap insurance premiums motor insurance' (these were anchor text links to other pages on the site)

and

'This section is to help search engines direct users that misspell or mistype words to pages that relate to information users where looking for.

Common misspellings variations: out surance , ousurance , out urance , outurance , out insurance , ousurance'

Is this OK according to Google's Guidlines?

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old July 10th, 2008, 11:10 AM
googler's Avatar
googler googler is offline
A.K.A. Grumpy Pants
SEO Chat Frequenter (2500 - 2999 posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vancouver, Washington, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,575 googler User rank is Brigadier General (60000 - 70000 Reputation Level)googler User rank is Brigadier General (60000 - 70000 Reputation Level)googler User rank is Brigadier General (60000 - 70000 Reputation Level)googler User rank is Brigadier General (60000 - 70000 Reputation Level)googler User rank is Brigadier General (60000 - 70000 Reputation Level)googler User rank is Brigadier General (60000 - 70000 Reputation Level)googler User rank is Brigadier General (60000 - 70000 Reputation Level)googler User rank is Brigadier General (60000 - 70000 Reputation Level)googler User rank is Brigadier General (60000 - 70000 Reputation Level)googler User rank is Brigadier General (60000 - 70000 Reputation Level)googler User rank is Brigadier General (60000 - 70000 Reputation Level)googler User rank is Brigadier General (60000 - 70000 Reputation Level)googler User rank is Brigadier General (60000 - 70000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 3 Weeks 4 Days 7 h 17 m 23 sec
Reputation Power: 647
Send a message via AIM to googler
I cant see anything specifically regarding against it. At least they are being transparent about what they are doing.

Footer text links have little value and they may very well rank for those misspellings just by having them there. I wonder if they get any traffic from it.
__________________
Work Smarter, Not Harder

Info for new members, including rules, useful stickies, and FAQ

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old July 10th, 2008, 11:17 AM
terriwells's Avatar
terriwells terriwells is offline
Administrator
Developer Shed Admin.
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 750 terriwells User rank is Captain (20000 - 30000 Reputation Level)terriwells User rank is Captain (20000 - 30000 Reputation Level)terriwells User rank is Captain (20000 - 30000 Reputation Level)terriwells User rank is Captain (20000 - 30000 Reputation Level)terriwells User rank is Captain (20000 - 30000 Reputation Level)terriwells User rank is Captain (20000 - 30000 Reputation Level)terriwells User rank is Captain (20000 - 30000 Reputation Level)terriwells User rank is Captain (20000 - 30000 Reputation Level)terriwells User rank is Captain (20000 - 30000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 2 Weeks 3 Days 7 h 4 m 53 sec
Reputation Power: 10
I believe it would be black hat if they were trying to hide the text, i.e. showing it as white text on a white background. But since they're not doing that, I can't see what would be black hat about it (unless those keywords AREN'T relevant to the web site).

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old July 10th, 2008, 11:31 AM
channel5's Avatar
channel5 channel5 is offline
from the horses mouth
SEO Chat Regular (2000 - 2499 posts)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 2,082 channel5 User rank is Major (30000 - 40000 Reputation Level)channel5 User rank is Major (30000 - 40000 Reputation Level)channel5 User rank is Major (30000 - 40000 Reputation Level)channel5 User rank is Major (30000 - 40000 Reputation Level)channel5 User rank is Major (30000 - 40000 Reputation Level)channel5 User rank is Major (30000 - 40000 Reputation Level)channel5 User rank is Major (30000 - 40000 Reputation Level)channel5 User rank is Major (30000 - 40000 Reputation Level)channel5 User rank is Major (30000 - 40000 Reputation Level)channel5 User rank is Major (30000 - 40000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Month 6 Days 16 h 59 m 42 sec
Reputation Power: 385
It's not blackhat, but it is a bit spammy, and a manual reviewer could flag it as spam.. it's not a hardcore offence, but it really is only there as spider food however nicely they dress it up.

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old July 10th, 2008, 12:55 PM
tstolber's Avatar
tstolber tstolber is offline
SEO Consultant
SEO Chat Expert (3500 - 3999 posts)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Posts: 3,652 tstolber User rank is Lieutenant Colonel (40000 - 50000 Reputation Level)tstolber User rank is Lieutenant Colonel (40000 - 50000 Reputation Level)tstolber User rank is Lieutenant Colonel (40000 - 50000 Reputation Level)tstolber User rank is Lieutenant Colonel (40000 - 50000 Reputation Level)tstolber User rank is Lieutenant Colonel (40000 - 50000 Reputation Level)tstolber User rank is Lieutenant Colonel (40000 - 50000 Reputation Level)tstolber User rank is Lieutenant Colonel (40000 - 50000 Reputation Level)tstolber User rank is Lieutenant Colonel (40000 - 50000 Reputation Level)tstolber User rank is Lieutenant Colonel (40000 - 50000 Reputation Level)tstolber User rank is Lieutenant Colonel (40000 - 50000 Reputation Level)tstolber User rank is Lieutenant Colonel (40000 - 50000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 2 Weeks 6 Days 18 h 17 m 8 sec
Reputation Power: 463
Send a message via Google Talk to tstolber Send a message via Skype to tstolber
Right, and Google's guidlines explicitly state that you should create pages for users not search eninges.

However this is ambiguous because it is for users who mis spelled words.

I don't think its too risky for them to operate this but as Channel 5 said it does look a bit spammy.

Would I do it for a client? NO!

Would I worry about it if it were my own site? NO!
Comments on this post
europa agrees: I gotta stop agreeing with you LOL!
__________________
SEO Tools & News

Follow me on Twitter @tstolber
Google SEO Circle - tstolber

IKROH SEO for Search Engine Optimisation UK - 01908 379938 / USA - 651 964 3392

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old July 11th, 2008, 03:52 AM
saet's Avatar
saet saet is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Beyond the pale
Posts: 305 saet User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)saet User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)saet User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)saet User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)saet User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Week 6 h 54 m 3 sec
Reputation Power: 13
Thanks for the feedback!

I'm just a bit puzzled by these sites as they are quite spammy yet are doing really well in the serps. The most perplexing thing is that these webmasters are interlinking their own sites on an epic level yet aren't being penalized in any way. For example one of these sites gets most of its 66000 links from other sites on the same IP with the same domain registrant details.

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old July 11th, 2008, 04:42 AM
Captain_Planet Captain_Planet is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 62 Captain_Planet User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 12 h 39 m 51 sec
Reputation Power: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by saet
Thanks for the feedback!

I'm just a bit puzzled by these sites as they are quite spammy yet are doing really well in the serps. The most perplexing thing is that these webmasters are interlinking their own sites on an epic level yet aren't being penalized in any way. For example one of these sites gets most of its 66000 links from other sites on the same IP with the same domain registrant details.


Quite often spammy sites will do well becasue the blackhat/dodgy techniques can actually work in the short term. The site will eventually get flagged and drop from the rankings, they probably know this and will set up another spammy site, and another one, and another one.

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old July 11th, 2008, 09:05 AM
saet's Avatar
saet saet is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Beyond the pale
Posts: 305 saet User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)saet User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)saet User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)saet User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)saet User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Week 6 h 54 m 3 sec
Reputation Power: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain_Planet
The site will eventually get flagged and drop from the rankings.


I've been monitoring these sites over the past 3 months and they don't seem to be raising any flags with Google.

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old July 11th, 2008, 09:11 AM
Captain_Planet Captain_Planet is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 62 Captain_Planet User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 12 h 39 m 51 sec
Reputation Power: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by saet
I've been monitoring these sites over the past 3 months and they don't seem to be raising any flags with Google.


Have you done a whois to see how old the site is? What are the URLs of the sites?
They might get a fair bit of traffic from the misspellings esspecially if they have lots of them as there will be little or no competition for them

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old July 12th, 2008, 08:02 AM
wjohnson wjohnson is offline
Registered User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 28 wjohnson User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 5 h 23 m 37 sec
Reputation Power: 0
I have done misspellings on my site as wanted people to find my site for mispellings what my site is about. I see this as spammy.

I deal with computers and have many misspellings for the name and come top for most of them.

For example try "domputers" my site is computersinspain com

Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old July 13th, 2008, 07:28 AM
Niche Niche is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 385 Niche User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)Niche User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)Niche User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)Niche User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)Niche User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Day 16 h 26 m 55 sec
Reputation Power: 12
It's playing pretty close to the edge.

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old July 13th, 2008, 01:44 PM
seim seim is offline
Registered User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1 seim User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 11 m 49 sec
Reputation Power: 0
Cool Go Seo Chat

Now your ranking #3 for ousurance,

I think the website owner could avoid possible spam detection by throwing a limit on the number of misspellings per page...maybe a couple miss spellings on one page..a couple more on another page...

It wouldn't be too hard for them to catch these. It may be in their algorithm to tank sites with 5+ consecutive misspelt words on a page. If its not coded into the algorithm already, it may be eventually. Keep your onsite as well as offsite optimization appearing as natural as possible.

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old July 14th, 2008, 12:02 AM
WWF WWF is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 102 WWF User rank is Private First Class (20 - 50 Reputation Level)WWF User rank is Private First Class (20 - 50 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Day 15 h 42 m 4 sec
Reputation Power: 7
I don't think this technique is come under black hat and Google has never say don't use for misspelling keyword. For my point of view some time this techniques are help for get the traffics.
As per saet comments that "I've been monitoring these sites over the past 3 months and they don't seem to be raising any flags with Google" , it may because of SEO work was not on the right path.

Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old July 14th, 2008, 01:54 PM
PsycheSkinner's Avatar
PsycheSkinner PsycheSkinner is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 58 PsycheSkinner User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)PsycheSkinner User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)PsycheSkinner User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)PsycheSkinner User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 9 h 19 m 58 sec
Reputation Power: 5
For me white hat is not 'will I escape being punished' it is 'is the traffic because my content is most relevant'. As such it is grey hat, at best, to lie in wait for people who can't spell.

Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old July 14th, 2008, 04:26 PM
BashRo BashRo is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 62 BashRo User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 14 h 7 m 25 sec
Reputation Power: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by PsycheSkinner
For me white hat is not 'will I escape being punished' it is 'is the traffic because my content is most relevant'. As such it is grey hat, at best, to lie in wait for people who can't spell.


in a way you right but i don't think it's easy to compete hard KW when every body else do what you said and more...

Reply With Quote
Reply

Viewing: SEO Chat ForumsGoogleGoogle Optimization > Is this blackhat SEO?


Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes  Rate This Thread 
Rate This Thread:


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
View Your Warnings | New Posts | Latest News | Latest Threads | Shoutbox
Forum Jump

Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
  
 


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

© 2003-2012 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 7 - Follow our Sitemap
 
SEO Chat is sponsored by:
Close this Sponsor Message