Google Optimization
 
Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
 
User Name:
Password:
Remember me
Go Back   SEO Chat ForumsGoogleGoogle Optimization
  • Dofollow Links From PR9 Sites (including .edu and .gov sites!!!);
  • 1-Year Link Guarantee;
  • Free 500-8,000 Submissions;
  • Campaign Absolutely Natural to Google.

BuySellLinks.com is a new Text Link Advertising Brokerage by the founder of LinkAdage that offers high-end text links and a premier membership base. We screen all advertisers and publishers and their web pages to make sure we are offering a service that works for everyone. Our plug-in is super easy to install but if you are hands off, w e offer free installation.

Tired of dealing with shady text link buyers and/or sellers? Try BuySellLinks.
Receive the tools necessary to be the rock star of your field. Our 12-month program teaches you the evolving world of multi-channel marketing as well as the complex issues and opportunities found in the industry.


Become a Member at BuySellLinks.com Now

Learn More!

Reply
Add This Thread To:
  Del.icio.us   Digg   Google   Spurl   Blink   Furl   Simpy   Y! MyWeb 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
 
Unread SEO Chat Forums Sponsor:
  #16  
Old March 31st, 2005, 09:27 PM
dougedoug dougedoug is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Novice (500 - 999 posts)
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Somewhere IN NJ
Posts: 622 dougedoug User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)dougedoug User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)dougedoug User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)dougedoug User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 4 Days 4 h 30 m 56 sec
Reputation Power: 11
Send a message via AIM to dougedoug
Im curious to read this over twice and really get into it in great detail. I think it would be good if we got a few people to intrepret this and then compare what everyone has to say. This way we can combine those ideas and get a general opinion that should prove to be more accurate.

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old March 31st, 2005, 09:32 PM
GeoffreyF67's Avatar
GeoffreyF67 GeoffreyF67 is offline
Resident Black Hat
SEO Chat Beginner (1000 - 1499 posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 1,437 GeoffreyF67 User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)GeoffreyF67 User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)GeoffreyF67 User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)GeoffreyF67 User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 5 Days 22 h 36 m 59 sec
Reputation Power: 13
Aged links just proves to me that you should go balls to the wall getting links when you first get your site. It'll hit the sandbox, come out and you'll have great rankings

G-Man
__________________
Black Hat, White Hat and More!

Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old March 31st, 2005, 09:44 PM
GeoffreyF67's Avatar
GeoffreyF67 GeoffreyF67 is offline
Resident Black Hat
SEO Chat Beginner (1000 - 1499 posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 1,437 GeoffreyF67 User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)GeoffreyF67 User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)GeoffreyF67 User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)GeoffreyF67 User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 5 Days 22 h 36 m 59 sec
Reputation Power: 13
23. The method of claim 22, wherein the behavior of links relate to at least one of appearance and disappearance of one or more links pointing to the document.

LOL - ouch. Sounds like they plan to (or already have) take into account things like the coop and purchased text links (ads).

Edit:

Yep. Look at this:

59. The method of claim 58, wherein the adjusting the ranking includes penalizing the ranking if the longevity indicates a short life for the linkage data and boosting the ranking if the longevity indicates a long life for the linkage data.

G-Man

Last edited by GeoffreyF67 : March 31st, 2005 at 09:54 PM.

Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old March 31st, 2005, 09:47 PM
dougedoug dougedoug is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Novice (500 - 999 posts)
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Somewhere IN NJ
Posts: 622 dougedoug User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)dougedoug User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)dougedoug User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)dougedoug User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 4 Days 4 h 30 m 56 sec
Reputation Power: 11
Send a message via AIM to dougedoug
Im reading this from the bottom up because I guess it seems to be a lot of parts more than a whole pie to me. Did anyone get the images to load properly. Im trying to view them and I dont seel them.

Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old March 31st, 2005, 09:56 PM
okguyjames's Avatar
okguyjames okguyjames is offline
Disregard Logic, Be Happy
SEO Chat Novice (500 - 999 posts)
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 502 okguyjames User rank is Lance Corporal (50 - 100 Reputation Level)okguyjames User rank is Lance Corporal (50 - 100 Reputation Level)okguyjames User rank is Lance Corporal (50 - 100 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Week 2 Days 19 h 58 m 55 sec
Reputation Power: 9
[0135] The foregoing description of preferred embodiments of the present invention provides illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed.

this line (near the bottom of the document), tapped in after the reader has been excited and exhausted from the apparent rush of information above it, in fact greatly damages all of the information that precedes it. it is a loophole that gives the applicant free reign to do as they please regardless of the stated methods. however, I'd like to review what other information may be culled from this discussion, but i don't think this changes much for now.

Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old March 31st, 2005, 09:57 PM
GeoffreyF67's Avatar
GeoffreyF67 GeoffreyF67 is offline
Resident Black Hat
SEO Chat Beginner (1000 - 1499 posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 1,437 GeoffreyF67 User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)GeoffreyF67 User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)GeoffreyF67 User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)GeoffreyF67 User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 5 Days 22 h 36 m 59 sec
Reputation Power: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by dougedoug
Im reading this from the bottom up because I guess it seems to be a lot of parts more than a whole pie to me. Did anyone get the images to load properly. Im trying to view them and I dont seel them.


No images loading for me.

G-Man

Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old March 31st, 2005, 09:59 PM
pteam's Avatar
pteam pteam is offline
SEO Elite
SEO Chat Novice (500 - 999 posts)
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 764 pteam User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)pteam User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)pteam User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)pteam User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)pteam User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)pteam User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 2 Weeks 2 Days 6 h 27 m 21 sec
Reputation Power: 30
Send a message via AIM to pteam
anybody have a summary yet?

Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old March 31st, 2005, 10:29 PM
GeoffreyF67's Avatar
GeoffreyF67 GeoffreyF67 is offline
Resident Black Hat
SEO Chat Beginner (1000 - 1499 posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 1,437 GeoffreyF67 User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)GeoffreyF67 User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)GeoffreyF67 User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)GeoffreyF67 User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 5 Days 22 h 36 m 59 sec
Reputation Power: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by pteam
anybody have a summary yet?


Be afraid...be very very afraid

G-Man

Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old March 31st, 2005, 11:10 PM
randfish's Avatar
randfish randfish is offline
SEO Chat Intermediate (1500 - 1999 posts)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,888 randfish User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)randfish User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)randfish User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)randfish User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)randfish User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)randfish User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 6 Days 15 h 11 m 21 sec
Reputation Power: 54
I should have a summary around 10am PST tomorrow. It's a ton of work...
__________________
CEO & Co-founder of SEOmoz

Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old March 31st, 2005, 11:26 PM
grimmdp's Avatar
grimmdp grimmdp is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 114 grimmdp User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Day 11 h 8 m 16 sec
Reputation Power: 8
So one of the things that strikes me is that there's been a lot of talk about the importance of beefing up your content. The first 15 claims speak entirely about the importance of adding new content, updating it regularly, and even determination of what's good content and what isn't.

I recently had a patent granted and one of the main points our atty stressed ad nauseum is that claim 1 is what you're trying to get granted. Correct me if I'm wrong (and I'm sure you will ;-), but their claim 1 is WAAAAAY broad, and would be amazing if it got granted this way.

Also important to note that this is Patent Pending. It hasn't been granted yet. If they didn't have 1000 round trips with the examiner and spend millions it would be incredible.

Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old March 31st, 2005, 11:55 PM
jman's Avatar
jman jman is offline
Jarrod Hunt
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 378 jman Negative: is most likely a SPAMMER and a traitor to the cause. 
Time spent in forums: 1 Day 8 h 33 m 4 sec
Reputation Power: 0
Its typical of companies to use general statements in their patents in order to delay the process of the patent becoming public information. The more general they make it the longer the review process can go. This process can go on for years, yet the company is still protected for the entire time the patent is pending.

Let me know if I can help with the summary Rand. It will be nice to be able to show clients some actual hard coded proof that the concepts we have been talking about for the past year are actually real and not just theorized.

I think it is important though to realize that many of the concepts they are talking about may take years to implement, and in some cases they may never be implemented. It is however a good blueprint for creating a optimization strategy that will stand the test of time.

Jarrod Hunt

Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old April 1st, 2005, 02:28 AM
Wit's Avatar
Wit Wit is offline
http://tinyurl.com/cz56g
SEO Chat God 2nd Plane (6000 - 6499 posts)
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: D0RDRECHT NL
Posts: 6,063 Wit User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)Wit User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)Wit User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)Wit User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)Wit User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 2 Months 6 Days 10 h 52 m 26 sec
Reputation Power: 24
This document makes me wonder how far they've moved on in a year and a half. My first guess would be: light years.

I'm glad though that we recognise most of the "methods" mentioned in the application. Also note that not everything that is covered in the document is necessarily implemented in real life. Heh, believe me, I've got my name (as a co-inventor) on some patent application, but the invention proved to be too difficult/expensive for a struggling company to develop.

In short, most patent applications only serve as a safeguard, to buy a little time. That and to annoy as many competitors as possible - I can imagine

Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old April 1st, 2005, 03:43 AM
mosaic_services mosaic_services is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 74 mosaic_services User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Day 6 h 31 m 51 sec
Number of bans: 1
Reputation Power: 0
Send a message via MSN to mosaic_services Send a message via Yahoo to mosaic_services
This is really great piece of information.

First I couldn't understand a bit but i read it the second time, I got the essence of it.

Great Phoenix

Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old April 1st, 2005, 03:53 AM
Wit's Avatar
Wit Wit is offline
http://tinyurl.com/cz56g
SEO Chat God 2nd Plane (6000 - 6499 posts)
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: D0RDRECHT NL
Posts: 6,063 Wit User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)Wit User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)Wit User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)Wit User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)Wit User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 2 Months 6 Days 10 h 52 m 26 sec
Reputation Power: 24
For more comments and interpretations, also take a look here:
http://www.threadwatch.org/node/2115

Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old April 1st, 2005, 05:05 AM
The Tank's Avatar
The Tank The Tank is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 63 The Tank User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 15 h 13 m 9 sec
Reputation Power: 10
All those companies selling links where you can get 1000's over night are going to get hammered, thus the price to do this is going to go way down. Making it cheap to go out and link to your competitors from sites not related to their topic and instantly sandboxing them.

And a neat little list from wmw......

-Carry on building links for ever. Old links decay in value.
-Don't add them too fast, or risk the spam filter.
-Don't add them too slowly or you won't get enough.
-Get links from fresh pages
-ask linking site to move the link to a different page to make it "fresher"
-Vary anchor text over time
-Don't change the content of your key pages as not to reflect incoming anchor
-register your domain for several years
-Use a solid server for nameservers (whatever that means)
-add new pages/content to your site all the time (poor bastards with lots of content need to add content faster)
-get all your buddies to add your site to their favourites
-link out to Amazon
-Put Adsense on your site and make sure it gets good clickthrough
-Rank well in the past because Google counts your old rank in the current rank.
-Don't jump up and down in the serps too much. Google likes stable rankings.
-make your site sticky. Sticky sites are favoured.

I have to say I don't think all of these things are going to be or already are implemented. It seems a lot of this is, we could do this or we might not

Last edited by The Tank : April 1st, 2005 at 05:16 AM.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Viewing: SEO Chat ForumsGoogleGoogle Optimization > Information Retrieval Based on Historical Data - Sandbox Explanation, Aging Delay?


Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes  Rate This Thread 
Rate This Thread:


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
View Your Warnings | New Posts | Latest News | Latest Threads | Shoutbox
Forum Jump

Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
  
 


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

© 2003-2012 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 3 - Follow our Sitemap
 
SEO Chat is sponsored by:
Close this Sponsor Message