Google Optimization
 
Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
 
User Name:
Password:
Remember me
Go Back   SEO Chat ForumsGoogleGoogle Optimization
  • Dofollow Links From PR9 Sites (including .edu and .gov sites!!!);
  • 1-Year Link Guarantee;
  • Free 500-8,000 Submissions;
  • Campaign Absolutely Natural to Google.

BuySellLinks.com is a new Text Link Advertising Brokerage by the founder of LinkAdage that offers high-end text links and a premier membership base. We screen all advertisers and publishers and their web pages to make sure we are offering a service that works for everyone. Our plug-in is super easy to install but if you are hands off, w e offer free installation.

Tired of dealing with shady text link buyers and/or sellers? Try BuySellLinks.
Receive the tools necessary to be the rock star of your field. Our 12-month program teaches you the evolving world of multi-channel marketing as well as the complex issues and opportunities found in the industry.


Become a Member at BuySellLinks.com Now

Learn More!

Reply
Add This Thread To:
  Del.icio.us   Digg   Google   Spurl   Blink   Furl   Simpy   Y! MyWeb 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
 
Unread SEO Chat Forums Sponsor:
  #1  
Old November 3rd, 2009, 02:52 PM
ukfish1 ukfish1 is offline
Registered User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: London
Posts: 11 ukfish1 User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 h 22 m 6 sec
Reputation Power: 0
Duplicate content

Hi

I have various versions of my home page, each optimised for a different area within london. The content was essentially the same, just changed slightly dependent on the area.

Until the last few weeks I was appearing on page one of Google for various search terms for each additional page. This is no longer the case and although these additional pages are still indexed by Google, they do not appear in the results at all.

Has google changed its rules in the last few weeks/months. Are these additional pages now being treated as duplicate content.

cheers

PJ

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old November 3rd, 2009, 03:20 PM
seo-sparky's Avatar
seo-sparky seo-sparky is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Novice (500 - 999 posts)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: USA Rocky Mountains
Posts: 646 seo-sparky User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)seo-sparky User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)seo-sparky User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)seo-sparky User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)seo-sparky User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)seo-sparky User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 6 Days 23 h 31 m 6 sec
Reputation Power: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by ukfish1
Hi

I have various versions of my home page, each optimised for a different area within london. The content was essentially the same, just changed slightly dependent on the area.

Until the last few weeks I was appearing on page one of Google for various search terms for each additional page. This is no longer the case and although these additional pages are still indexed by Google, they do not appear in the results at all.

Has google changed its rules in the last few weeks/months. Are these additional pages now being treated as duplicate content.

cheers

PJ


If they're the same content, google will keep the first instance it found in the SERPs, and drop the others.
__________________
SEO Sparky

PosiTracker Search Engine Monitoring *Home of the Search Engine Seismograph*
FlexPortal CMS / Newspaper Software
Montana Photography

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old November 3rd, 2009, 03:31 PM
ukfish1 ukfish1 is offline
Registered User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: London
Posts: 11 ukfish1 User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 h 22 m 6 sec
Reputation Power: 0
they are probably about 90% duplicate content.

the weird thing is they all showed up well in the resulst for a long time and have just recentky been dropped.

Thanks

PJ

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old November 3rd, 2009, 04:21 PM
Forbrukslån Forbrukslån is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 66 Forbrukslån Negative: is most likely a SPAMMER and a traitor to the cause. 
Time spent in forums: 8 h 10 m 22 sec
Warnings Level: 3
Reputation Power: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by ukfish1
Hi

I have various versions of my home page, each optimised for a different area within london. The content was essentially the same, just changed slightly dependent on the area.

Until the last few weeks I was appearing on page one of Google for various search terms for each additional page. This is no longer the case and although these additional pages are still indexed by Google, they do not appear in the results at all.

Has google changed its rules in the last few weeks/months. Are these additional pages now being treated as duplicate content.

cheers

PJ


I would recommend the following video from google. It is 14 min long, deals with duplicate pages and I have to say the best video I have seen come out from google ever.

http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=GoogleWebmasterHelp#p/u/15/6hSoXutuj0g

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old November 4th, 2009, 02:11 AM
ukfish1 ukfish1 is offline
Registered User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: London
Posts: 11 ukfish1 User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 h 22 m 6 sec
Reputation Power: 0
thanks, I'll check it out.

Guess I just need to re-write the additional pages so they don't fall into the duplicate content trap.

cheers

Paul

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old November 4th, 2009, 05:37 AM
Forbrukslån Forbrukslån is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 66 Forbrukslån Negative: is most likely a SPAMMER and a traitor to the cause. 
Time spent in forums: 8 h 10 m 22 sec
Warnings Level: 3
Reputation Power: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by ukfish1
thanks, I'll check it out.

Guess I just need to re-write the additional pages so they don't fall into the duplicate content trap.

cheers

Paul


Actually, I am not sure about that. Do watch the video!

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old November 4th, 2009, 11:12 AM
Mike Smithfield Mike Smithfield is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 84 Mike Smithfield User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)Mike Smithfield User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)Mike Smithfield User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)Mike Smithfield User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 13 h 6 m 49 sec
Reputation Power: 4
Sooner or later Google will find the duplicate content, it is better to avoid penalties. Write unique and fresh content.

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old November 4th, 2009, 11:28 AM
Visio's Avatar
Visio Visio is offline
Moderator
SEO Chat Loyal (3000 - 3499 posts)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 3,416 Visio User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Visio User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Visio User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Visio User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Visio User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Visio User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Visio User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Visio User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Month 2 Weeks 4 Days 8 h 5 sec
Reputation Power: 145
Send a message via MSN to Visio Send a message via Google Talk to Visio
Quote:
Originally Posted by seo-sparky
If they're the same content, google will keep the first instance it found in the SERPs, and drop the others.


Not necessarily true... an authority site can steal a piece of content even if the original site has had theirs indexed for a fair amount of time.
__________________
-DON’T BUY Keyword Elite V2 till you read this review- Please Digg!
-SeoChat SEO FAQ - Read the FAQ. It may answer your question.
-Ultimate Guide to Link Building - What you always wanted to know!

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old November 4th, 2009, 01:13 PM
banker0679 banker0679 is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 356 banker0679 User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)banker0679 User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)banker0679 User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)banker0679 User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level)banker0679 User rank is Sergeant (500 - 2000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 2 Days 20 h 26 m 41 sec
Reputation Power: 10
This was done a few months ago with the Affiliate Slap

Most affiliate sites have the same content so they all got slapped.

Is it a penalty? no

If you change the content, then you'll come back.
If it were a penalty then you would need to do a reinclusion request.

Either way....you will need to change ALL THE CONTENT on your website...and also make sure you didn't distribute the content across the net or didn't copy the content from another site

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old November 4th, 2009, 01:18 PM
seo-sparky's Avatar
seo-sparky seo-sparky is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Novice (500 - 999 posts)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: USA Rocky Mountains
Posts: 646 seo-sparky User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)seo-sparky User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)seo-sparky User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)seo-sparky User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)seo-sparky User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)seo-sparky User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 6 Days 23 h 31 m 6 sec
Reputation Power: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by Visio
Not necessarily true... an authority site can steal a piece of content even if the original site has had theirs indexed for a fair amount of time.


Maybe I misunderstood the OP. I thought both instances of the content resides on his site.
Comments on this post
europa disagrees: Maybe you shouldn't answer questions where you don't know the answer.

Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old November 4th, 2009, 05:57 PM
bryanfuller bryanfuller is offline
Permanently Banned
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 16 bryanfuller User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 3 h 24 m 18 sec
Warnings Level: 10
Number of bans: 1
Reputation Power: 0
not an ideal approach keep the content unique...!

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old November 5th, 2009, 11:07 AM
Visio's Avatar
Visio Visio is offline
Moderator
SEO Chat Loyal (3000 - 3499 posts)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 3,416 Visio User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Visio User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Visio User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Visio User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Visio User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Visio User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Visio User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level)Visio User rank is First Lieutenant (10000 - 20000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 Month 2 Weeks 4 Days 8 h 5 sec
Reputation Power: 145
Send a message via MSN to Visio Send a message via Google Talk to Visio
Quote:
Originally Posted by seo-sparky
Maybe I misunderstood the OP. I thought both instances of the content resides on his site.


The original question was dealing with duplication of content on the same site... however I was not dealing with the OP's question but rather deviating towards the idea that the first version that is indexed is always chosen as the original which is just not the case.

As far as the original question on the content goes, the problem is "optimizing" instead of targeting. Stop duplicating and optimizing and start delivering unique content.

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old November 5th, 2009, 11:29 AM
seo-sparky's Avatar
seo-sparky seo-sparky is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Novice (500 - 999 posts)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: USA Rocky Mountains
Posts: 646 seo-sparky User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)seo-sparky User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)seo-sparky User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)seo-sparky User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)seo-sparky User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level)seo-sparky User rank is Sergeant Major (2000 - 5000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 6 Days 23 h 31 m 6 sec
Reputation Power: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by Visio
The original question was dealing with duplication of content on the same site... however I was not dealing with the OP's question but rather deviating towards the idea that the first version that is indexed is always chosen as the original which is just not the case.

As far as the original question on the content goes, the problem is "optimizing" instead of targeting. Stop duplicating and optimizing and start delivering unique content.


I agree to a certain extent, but I believe that authority sites are not in the habit of blatant scraping or copyright infringement, but I could be wrong.

Google claims to be improving their safeguards, and I believe that to be true as the operator of several aggregations sites. My sites have higher PR and get spidered more often than my contributing customer's sites do, however my sites are dropped from the SERPs for their article content. This is true 100% of the time in my experience. This may be due to the fact that I follow the rules and link back to the source of the articles however.

Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old November 5th, 2009, 11:39 AM
edosauyi edosauyi is offline
Contributing User
SEO Chat Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 42 edosauyi Negative: is most likely a SPAMMER and a traitor to the cause. 
Time spent in forums: 8 h 37 m 21 sec
Reputation Power: 0
Same thinh have also happened to me, i had to delete the duplicates and leave only the original

Reply With Quote
Reply

Viewing: SEO Chat ForumsGoogleGoogle Optimization > Duplicate content


Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes  Rate This Thread 
Rate This Thread:


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
View Your Warnings | New Posts | Latest News | Latest Threads | Shoutbox
Forum Jump

Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
  
 


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

© 2003-2012 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 6 - Follow our Sitemap
 
SEO Chat is sponsored by:
Close this Sponsor Message