Craigslist.org looks like a link farm... but no penalty
Discuss Craigslist.org looks like a link farm... but no penalty in the Google Optimization forum on SEO Chat. Craigslist.org looks like a link farm... but no penalty Google Optimization forum discussing techniques to increase rank in Google. Find help for defeating spam pages, building site trust, and beating the Google algorithm. Also read about the best SEO tools to help with Google search.
BuySellLinks.com is a new Text Link Advertising Brokerage by the founder of LinkAdage that offers high-end text links and a premier membership base. We screen all advertisers and publishers and their web pages to make sure we are offering a service that works for everyone. Our plug-in is super easy to install but if you are hands off, w e offer free installation.
Tired of dealing with shady text link buyers and/or sellers? Try BuySellLinks.
Receive the tools necessary to be the rock star of your field. Our 12-month program teaches you the evolving world of multi-channel marketing as well as the complex issues and opportunities found in the industry.
Posts: 221
Time spent in forums: 1 Day 14 h 11 m 9 sec
Reputation Power: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Market-Trend
& its an institution.....but as the above poster states, its not a link farm just a very functional site that does what it says on the tin....
I see a ton of organic results from craigslist in Google, where all the page is is a title/description and a bunch of affiliate links. Obviously being abused, but Craigslist seems not to do anything about it.
Posts: 48
Time spent in forums: 22 h 24 m 22 sec
Reputation Power: 8
What I meant was that a page like www.craigslist.org may "look" like a link farm to a search engine.
I just read the definition of the term "link farm".
"link farm" is the wrong choice of words, my appologies...
Let me re-phrase:
How can a page like www.craigslist.org that is comprised entirely of 100's of links with no actual content not be penalised in Google?
I was thinking about using the same format for a website, but I have been advised against it by many on these forums.
I'm wondering why www.craigslist.org is not penalised for using the above mentioned format, whereas mine or your site would most definitely be penalised in the big G... if not banned.
Posts: 164
Time spent in forums: 1 Day 6 h 6 m 28 sec
Reputation Power: 7
Craiglist has GOOD HISTORY and HIGH AUTHORITY (many many years) - even if they looks little fishy - Google will "forgive" them - not like any "startup" spammers who will be banned right away.
Posts: 1,129
Time spent in forums: 3 Weeks 1 Day 4 h 56 m
Reputation Power: 16
I can't see anything that I can see that contravenes Google's quality guidelines that could lead to a penalty or ban. In essence the site is just weird directory/forum hybrid with a quirky navigation.
__________________ Sussex Barn Dance
The Hokey Cokey - is that really what it's all about?
Posts: 221
Time spent in forums: 1 Day 14 h 11 m 9 sec
Reputation Power: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by john alphaone
I can't see anything that I can see that contravenes Google's quality guidelines that could lead to a penalty or ban. In essence the site is just weird directory/forum hybrid with a quirky navigation.
Well when some joker uses a Craigslist page like this:
halifax.craigslist.org/inkjets or whatever, then repeats the different cities in Canada and has affiliate links to U.S. affiliate companies... no content, nothing meaningful except an authority site doorway page to affiliate links. Their directory system is being abused. There is something wrong with that...
Posts: 2,350
Time spent in forums: 3 Weeks 3 Days 5 h 59 m 33 sec
Reputation Power: 49
From a search engine's perspective, craiglist looks like a directory. DMOZ and Yahoo's directory pages have ranked very well for years. Why shouldn't craigslist?
Most people focus WAY TOO MUCH on tricks and techniques, both to use and to avoid because they are "good" or "bad" for SEO. In general, creating a site with nothing but a bunch of links to other sites is not going to do well in the SEs, but that does not mean that EVERY site with that set up will be penalized. Start by creating a VALUABLE site. If it really is that valuable, other trusted sites will link to it, it will gain trust and authority and it will rank well.
SEO tips and tricks are all good and fine, but don't take your eye off the ball. A high quality site that lots of people find of high value will almost certainly rank well in the long run regardless of how it is "optimized". Craigslist is a great example.
__________________
"Live never to be ashamed of what is written about you. Even if what is written is not true" -- Richard Bach
Posts: 761
Time spent in forums: 2 Days 1 m 24 sec
Reputation Power: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandall
From a search engine's perspective, craiglist looks like a directory. DMOZ and Yahoo's directory pages have ranked very well for years. Why shouldn't craigslist?
\
In defense of the OP, both of those are affiliated with large companies, while Craigslist initially was not.
Additionally, Craigslist is incredibly sloppy and contains little to no actual content text as previously said. I don't see a site of similar nature doing very well in SERPs unless it had the reputation backing.
Posts: 48
Time spent in forums: 22 h 24 m 22 sec
Reputation Power: 8
Quote:
its an institution.....
Quote:
Craiglist has GOOD HISTORY and HIGH AUTHORITY (many many years) - even if they looks little fishy - Google will "forgive" them - not like any "startup" spammers who will be banned right away.
Quote:
I don't see a site of similar nature doing very well in SERPs unless it had the reputation backing.
OK, so the concensus seems to be that Craigslists gets a pass from Google because of it's history/reputation.
That leads me to the inevitable question:
Does G's algorithm have "www.craigslist.org = OK" hard-coded into it? How does another legitimate site using craigslist's format not get immediately rejected by the Google?
Posts: 1,129
Time spent in forums: 3 Weeks 1 Day 4 h 56 m
Reputation Power: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by lemonowner
OK, so the concensus seems to be that Craigslists gets a pass from Google because of it's history/reputation.
Nope. Everyone gets a pass from Google unless you're bad enough to get banned. They're not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lemonowner
Does G's algorithm have "www.craigslist.org = OK" hard-coded into it?
No need. Their volume and quality of their inbound links will give them a good Trustrank score (or whatever measure of authority Google are actually using).
Quote:
Originally Posted by lemonowner
How does another legitimate site using craigslist's format not get immediately rejected by the Google?
A new entrant would struggle to get 21 million pages indexed, as they have.