Discuss Next-generation infrastructure in the Google News forum on SEO Chat. Next-generation infrastructure Google News forum discussing the latest Google corporate actions. Find information and talk about new features, algorithm updates, company acquisitions, Google goof-ups, and legal battles the search engine is in.
BuySellLinks.com is a new Text Link Advertising Brokerage by the founder of LinkAdage that offers high-end text links and a premier membership base. We screen all advertisers and publishers and their web pages to make sure we are offering a service that works for everyone. Our plug-in is super easy to install but if you are hands off, w e offer free installation.
Tired of dealing with shady text link buyers and/or sellers? Try BuySellLinks.
Receive the tools necessary to be the rock star of your field. Our 12-month program teaches you the evolving world of multi-channel marketing as well as the complex issues and opportunities found in the industry.
Posts: 82
Time spent in forums: 1 Day 14 h 42 m 27 sec
Reputation Power: 6
Next-generation infrastructure
News from Google
----------------------------------------------
Help test some next-generation infrastructure
Monday, August 10, 2009 at 4:14 PM
Webmaster Level: All
To build a great web search engine, you need to:
1. Crawl a large chunk of the web.
2. Index the resulting pages and compute how reputable those pages are.
3. Rank and return the most relevant pages for users' queries as quickly as possible.
For the last several months, a large team of Googlers has been working on a secret project: a next-generation architecture for Google's web search. It's the first step in a process that will let us push the envelope on size, indexing speed, accuracy, comprehensiveness and other dimensions. The new infrastructure sits "under the hood" of Google's search engine, which means that most users won't notice a difference in search results. But web developers and power searchers might notice a few differences, so we're opening up a web developer preview to collect feedback.
Some parts of this system aren't completely finished yet, so we'd welcome feedback on any issues you see. We invite you to visit the web developer preview of Google's new infrastructure at http://www2.sandbox.google.com/ and try searches there.
Right now, we only want feedback on the differences between Google's current search results and our new system. We're also interested in higher-level feedback ("These types of sites seem to rank better or worse in the new system") in addition to "This specific site should or shouldn't rank for this query." Engineers will be reading the feedback, but we won't have the cycles to send replies.
Here's how to give us feedback: Do a search at http://www2.sandbox.google.com/ and look on the search results page for a link at the bottom of the page that says "Dissatisfied? Help us improve." Click on that link, type your feedback in the text box and then include the word caffeine somewhere in the text box. Thanks in advance for your feedback!
Posted by Sitaram Iyer, Staff Software Engineer, and Matt Cutts, Principal Engineer
Posts: 2,728
Time spent in forums: 2 Weeks 3 Days 14 h 25 m 42 sec
Reputation Power: 466
I would expect that most of us SEO types have seen this release as it's posted on everything from Matt's blog to GWC areas as well as probably more'n dozens of sites.
I've been playing with it myself now for a bit, and all I can add is that for our clients - plus MAPS and LOCAL 10-pak items, the variance is minor.
But yes, you should investigate the new algos, and then USE the feedback link to tell them what the diff's you find mean to you...and your clients....
Works, eh?
Jim
__________________ Jim Rudnick MCSD
Canadian SEO
Twitter: JVRudnick
Posts: 1,240
Time spent in forums: 4 Weeks 1 Day 7 h 53 m 46 sec
Reputation Power: 341
Quote:
Originally Posted by TR-DK
News from Google
----------------------------------------------
Help test some next-generation infrastructure
Monday, August 10, 2009 at 4:14 PM
Webmaster Level: All
To build a great web search engine, you need to:
1. Crawl a large chunk of the web.
2. Index the resulting pages and compute how reputable those pages are.
3. Rank and return the most relevant pages for users' queries as quickly as possible.
For the last several months, a large team of Googlers has been working on a secret project: a next-generation architecture for Google's web search. It's the first step in a process that will let us push the envelope on size, indexing speed, accuracy, comprehensiveness and other dimensions. The new infrastructure sits "under the hood" of Google's search engine, which means that most users won't notice a difference in search results. But web developers and power searchers might notice a few differences, so we're opening up a web developer preview to collect feedback.
Some parts of this system aren't completely finished yet, so we'd welcome feedback on any issues you see. We invite you to visit the web developer preview of Google's new infrastructure at http://www2.sandbox.google.com/ and try searches there.
Right now, we only want feedback on the differences between Google's current search results and our new system. We're also interested in higher-level feedback ("These types of sites seem to rank better or worse in the new system") in addition to "This specific site should or shouldn't rank for this query." Engineers will be reading the feedback, but we won't have the cycles to send replies.
Here's how to give us feedback: Do a search at http://www2.sandbox.google.com/ and look on the search results page for a link at the bottom of the page that says "Dissatisfied? Help us improve." Click on that link, type your feedback in the text box and then include the word caffeine somewhere in the text box. Thanks in advance for your feedback!
Posted by Sitaram Iyer, Staff Software Engineer, and Matt Cutts, Principal Engineer
y u ve copied and pasted it from Google Webmaster Central blog. Dont u know we SEOs are pretty smart in finding out the duplicate contents esp when it come straight from Google Mouth.
Posts: 1,240
Time spent in forums: 4 Weeks 1 Day 7 h 53 m 46 sec
Reputation Power: 341
Quote:
Originally Posted by JVRudnick
I would expect that most of us SEO types have seen this release as it's posted on everything from Matt's blog to GWC areas as well as probably more'n dozens of sites.
I've been playing with it myself now for a bit, and all I can add is that for our clients - plus MAPS and LOCAL 10-pak items, the variance is minor.
But yes, you should investigate the new algos, and then USE the feedback link to tell them what the diff's you find mean to you...and your clients....
Works, eh?
Jim
Some guys have already done the testing. U might be interested in knowing the results:
Del.icio.us
Digg
Google
Spurl
Blink
Furl
Simpy
Y! MyWeb
Linear Mode
